Just for fun.....

MatthewT · 08-26-2007, 11:15 PM

Ole Thomas Hollis was a great player for the Saints last year, except for the last four games during regular season. But if the dude cannot stay away from Popeyes and KFC, which is hard to do, then I say he needs to go. The dude signed a big contract in the offseason and now looks to have lost his starting job. There is no way the Saints can pay him the big money as a second string player. On the other hand, I say give him some more time. This year is all about winning a Superbowl. At some point his fat ass will bail us out of some situation. Maybe his fat ass will stuff Tom Brady for a key sack in the Superbowl?

saintsrule · 08-26-2007, 11:49 PM

I would keep Hollis. He is a starting DT in the league. The RB, Thomas is a #3 or 4 RB, at best. And although I do believe the CB, Thomas can still start in the league, he will probably be the #3 or 4 CB on this team.

Budsdrinker · 08-27-2007, 08:07 AM

Yeah, as much as I would like to keep Pierre, if it came down to choosing between Pierre and Hollis I would have to keep Fat Man Hollis just because even if he falls down it makes it difficult for a RB to get through the hole.

papz · 08-27-2007, 08:31 AM

Hollis and Fred Thomas have more value than Pierre by far. There's no way I'd cut a starting DT or nickle/dime corner, who can start I might add, for a would be 4th running back on our depth chart.

fhotard · 08-27-2007, 03:10 PM

Like most others, I'd have to keep the fat boy...

m_c_hamster · 08-27-2007, 10:06 PM

I keep Hollis and the reason is simple................experience.

08-26-2007, 11:15 PM	#1
MatthewT 1000 Posts + Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Mississippi Posts: 2,729	Re: Just for fun..... Ole Thomas Hollis was a great player for the Saints last year, except for the last four games during regular season. But if the dude cannot stay away from Popeyes and KFC, which is hard to do, then I say he needs to go. The dude signed a big contract in the offseason and now looks to have lost his starting job. There is no way the Saints can pay him the big money as a second string player. On the other hand, I say give him some more time. This year is all about winning a Superbowl. At some point his fat ass will bail us out of some situation. Maybe his fat ass will stuff Tom Brady for a key sack in the Superbowl?

08-26-2007, 11:49 PM	#2
saintsrule 500th Post Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 657	Re: Just for fun..... I would keep Hollis. He is a starting DT in the league. The RB, Thomas is a #3 or 4 RB, at best. And although I do believe the CB, Thomas can still start in the league, he will probably be the #3 or 4 CB on this team.
saintsrule 500th Post Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 657

08-27-2007, 08:31 AM	#4
papz Problem? Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: New Orleans Posts: 11,793	Re: Just for fun..... Hollis and Fred Thomas have more value than Pierre by far. There's no way I'd cut a starting DT or nickle/dime corner, who can start I might add, for a would be 4th running back on our depth chart.

08-27-2007, 03:10 PM	#5
fhotard 100th Post Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Pensacola, FL Posts: 263	Re: Just for fun..... Like most others, I'd have to keep the fat boy...

08-27-2007, 10:06 PM	#6
m_c_hamster Rookie Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 2	Re: Just for fun..... I keep Hollis and the reason is simple................experience.
m_c_hamster Rookie Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 2

08-27-2007, 08:07 AM	#3
Budsdrinker A Cajun Transforming TX Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: The Woodlands, Texas Posts: 2,787	Re: Just for fun..... Yeah, as much as I would like to keep Pierre, if it came down to choosing between Pierre and Hollis I would have to keep Fat Man Hollis just because even if he falls down it makes it difficult for a RB to get through the hole.