![]() |
Re: Reggie Bush
Quote:
|
Re: Reggie Bush
Quote:
Whats your point about LenDale??? go back and read my previous post. |
Re: Reggie Bush
Quote:
"Bush had an excellent 2005 season, as he was a unanimous All-American first-team pick and the winner of the Heisman Memorial Trophy. He was named the Associated Press 2005 Player of the Year, Pigskin Club of Washington D.C. Offensive Player of the Year, Touchdown Club of Columbus Player of the Year and was the recipient of the Walter Camp Player of the Year Award and Doak Walker Award (nation's best running back). He led the nation with an average of 222.3 all-purpose yards per game. and finished fourth in the NCAA Division 1-A ranks with an average of 133.85 yards per game rushing. " Pretty impressive for a non-feature back. 2005 Rushing Stats: Lendale - 197 Carries for 1,302 Reggie - 200 for 1,740 First off, your argument that Reggie can't be a feature back because he has never been one makes almost as little sense as your claim that your proximity to USC makes you an authority on the matter. Give us some points that actually back up your claim like "he's too small" or "he dances around too much", or better yet, give some thoughts about how he could develop into a feature back. I think Reggie can definitely be a feature back. I do think he needs a power back to complement him, but that in no way means he can't take the bulk of the carries (see Westbrook/Buckhalter). I also think he has some bad tendencies that he needs to address/is addressing. He needs to find the balance between being patient and hitting the hole. Having better blocking and a more effective passing game would go a long way to help Reggie realize his potential as well. I am not ready label a kid who has scored 11 TDs in 1 1/4 seasons a bust. |
Re: Reggie Bush
To say Reggie Bush can never be a feature running back because he never has been one just isn't true. There might be another reason (I can't think of one right now but) That's not a very good one. It's like saying I can never be a sumo wrestler because I never have been one. If I have the talent and brain to do it and the time to learn it, even I could do it. You give Reggie enough time and I think (IMHO) he can make it. There are many others that have pulled it off. So give me another reason. To me, that one is very weak.
|
Re: Reggie Bush
Quote:
First of all don't make the mistake that I have called Reggie Bush a bust. I have never said that! Second of all thanks for posting off of the numbers which only proves my point that he wasn't the feature back at USC. It poves there numbers were close and shared. Thanks again for proving my point. |
Re: Reggie Bush
Quote:
The statement is true he hasn't been one. Nor is there any proof to show he can be one... there is however evidence that he will never be one. If you want to consider the reason weak that is fine but its a reason none the less. There is no reasoning for saying he is and will be when he in fact has never been a feature back. |
Re: Reggie Bush
Quote:
End of my discussing this subject. I prefer to at least try to keep some kind of positive outlook. It's hard but it can be done.:) P.S. I never said he had been an every down feature back. |
Re: Reggie Bush
I think Reggie has the potential to be very, very, very dangerous - when he learns to run straight up through a seam like Westbrook. Westbrook had to learn as well, so it's not like Reggie's vision is all it's ever going to be. He just needs some more experience with the NFL, how to spot good seams, and to run to them with his 4.3 speed. He'll be fine, just have some patience.
|
Re: Reggie Bush
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Reggie Bush
Quote:
There has been a lot of things I have been right on, including our beloved Offensive line for years now. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:27 PM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com