![]() |
Re: So, Saints, you've just beaten the three worst teams in the NFL....
Doesn't matter. At the time they were 2-0 and their running game was looking phenomenal. In other words, they weren't bad heading into the Saints game.
Question: If the Saints went 12-4 this season, can Tampa Bay and Carolina brag about beating a GREAT Saints team in weeks 2 and 4? |
Re: So, Saints, you've just beaten the three worst teams in the NFL....
Have you ever heard of a "bad 2-0 team"? Records are not always indicative of how good a team is or isn't. Those two wins came against a Panthers team that finished 8-8 and a Tampa team who finished 4-12. We were a good 2-0 team, and they were a bad 2-0 team, and we proved that when the two went head-to-head.
|
Re: So, Saints, you've just beaten the three worst teams in the NFL....
Using your logic........if the Saints go on to have a successful season this year, we can say they were a "good 0-4 team". Well, they weren't. They were a team that got completely embarrassed 3 of those 4 times. Of the 4 losses, the only team you could say (at that point in time) that appeared to be inferior to New Orleans despite beating them was Carolina.
You can say that the Saints had good players.....resiliant players.....good coaches.......good personnel, whatever........but there was nothing good about them as a "team" during the first month of this season. If you recall at the time of that Saints/Falcons game.....the big storyline (aside from the Superdome re-opening) was that both teams were 2-0 and fighting for 1st place in the NFC South. Now, if you wanted to say that the Saints beat a "bad Falcon team", it would apply more to their 2nd meeting of the season than the first. |
Re: So, Saints, you've just beaten the three worst teams in the NFL....
[QUOTE=
If you recall at the time of that Saints/Falcons game.....the big storyline (aside from the Superdome re-opening) was that both teams were 2-0 and fighting for 1st place in the NFC South. Now, if you wanted to say that the Saints beat a "bad Falcon team", it would apply more to their 2nd meeting of the season than the first.[/QUOTE] Atlanta was the top rushing team going into that game and we didn't have a good run D. A lot of folks had the Falcons going to the playoffs at that point in the season. |
Re: So, Saints, you've just beaten the three worst teams in the NFL....
I will agree as I am sure everyone else will, The first three games this team had their heads in the clouds or their heads up their butts.
I just don't see how any of it really matters. Good team, bad team.... we will know what kinda team we have after this week. JAX is good even if Gray starts. This is a "good" team we are about to play. |
Re: So, Saints, you've just beaten the three worst teams in the NFL....
Quote:
|
Re: So, Saints, you've just beaten the three worst teams in the NFL....
Quote:
|
Re: So, Saints, you've just beaten the three worst teams in the NFL....
Quote:
|
Re: So, Saints, you've just beaten the three worst teams in the NFL....
BlackHoleSlam, the Saints are a good team, not great team, that played poorly in the first 4 games. Why are you arguing symantics? The Falcons were a bad team last year - period. They may have been 2-0 at the time, but there have been a few teams to start off a season 2-0 and not be good. Remember, you can be 2-0 and be lucky, instead of good. However, luck will eventually run out, but good teams continue to win. Are you a closet Falcons fan?
|
Re: So, Saints, you've just beaten the three worst teams in the NFL....
Quote:
We have to face reality, the Colts or the PATS are going to win the SB this year, and I am leaning more towards the PATS. Both have a truely great team. We, on the other hand, don't really know if we have a good or bad team right now. This week should gives us some insight into that question and give us the answer we all want to know. Is this team "Good". |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:48 PM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com