|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; BlackHoleSlam, the Saints are a good team, not great team, that played poorly in the first 4 games. Why are you arguing symantics? The Falcons were a bad team last year - period. They may have been 2-0 at the ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 775
|
Re: So, Saints, you've just beaten the three worst teams in the NFL....
BlackHoleSlam, the Saints are a good team, not great team, that played poorly in the first 4 games. Why are you arguing symantics? The Falcons were a bad team last year - period. They may have been 2-0 at the time, but there have been a few teams to start off a season 2-0 and not be good. Remember, you can be 2-0 and be lucky, instead of good. However, luck will eventually run out, but good teams continue to win. Are you a closet Falcons fan?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 40
|
Re: So, Saints, you've just beaten the three worst teams in the NFL....
Originally Posted by mjf150
LOL @ closet falcons fan.![]()
You are basing your statement on what the Falcons later became. Even after the Saints game, the Falcons still ended up starting 5-2. Meaning that nearly halfway into the season, they were still a viable threat in the division. Just because they went on a 4-game losing streak and eventually folded into dogcrap doesn't mean that they weren't a "good" team at the time that the Saints played them in the Superdome. The Saints started the 2002 season 6-1. During that season, they defeated Tampa Bay twice. Does that mean the Saints were never a good team during that season AT ANY POINT, since they "finished" by missing the playoffs? |
[QUOTE=saintswhodi;143884]Maybe you should hook yourself up with a [B]readeing[/B] comprehension for dummies book.[/QUOTE]
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|