Kaesviharn could get more time

JOESAM2002 · 12-05-2007, 10:05 AM

Originally Posted by WhoDat205

I probably the leader of the Usama Young fan club here, but I gotta say, Jason Craft has been playing lights out this year. I'd start him over both David and Young at this point.

I know he had the winning TD completed on him, but he was in position, it was just a good throw and an excellent catch.

You're absolutly right. Craft couldn't have had better coverage. The receivers timing was perfect. Jason was much shorter than the receiver. But the coverage was there.

saintsfan1976 · 12-05-2007, 10:10 AM

Originally Posted by JOESAM2002

You're absolutly right. Craft couldn't have had better coverage. The receivers timing was perfect. Jason was much shorter than the receiver. But the coverage was there.

Agreed, but why didn't we take a timeout when they moved Stevens out there??

JOESAM2002 · 12-05-2007, 10:20 AM

Originally Posted by saintsfan1976

Agreed, but why didn't we take a timeout when they moved Stevens out there??

Good question. I wish I had an answer to it.

WhoDat205 · 12-05-2007, 10:34 AM

Originally Posted by saintsfan1976

Agreed, but why didn't we take a timeout when they moved Stevens out there??

Originally Posted by JOESAM2002

Good question. I wish I had an answer to it.

I guessing that was sarcasm, right? Because we were out of them. I'm not jumping on the "fire payton" bus, but his use of Time Outs is terrible. He constantly uses TOs in the 3rd quarter to change schemes defensively and it constantly bites us in the butt.

I wish someone smarter than I am would do a statistical analysis on what a Time Out is worth, kinda like the economist that did the study saying that teams should go for it on 4th and 10 anywhere past their 35yl. I'd just be interested to see how many yards a TO is worth statistically speaking.

JOESAM2002 · 12-05-2007, 10:40 AM

Originally Posted by WhoDat205

I guessing that was sarcasm, right? Because we were out of them. I'm not jumping on the "fire payton" bus, but his use of Time Outs is terrible. He constantly uses TOs in the 3rd quarter to change schemes defensively and it constantly bites us in the butt.

I wish someone smarter than I am would do a statistical analysis on what a Time Out is worth, kinda like the economist that did the study saying that teams should go for it on 4th and 10 anywhere past their 35yl. I'd just be interested to see how many yards a TO is worth statistically speaking.

Man, can you imagine how many answers there would be to that question?
There would be so many things that would change the answer. Like What yard line they are on. What down is it. I think far to many variables to get one firm answer. But boy if you could........

12-05-2007, 10:05 AM	#1
JOESAM2002 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: CRYSTAL BEACH TEXAS Posts: 4,100	Re: Kaesviharn could get more time Originally Posted by WhoDat205 I probably the leader of the Usama Young fan club here, but I gotta say, Jason Craft has been playing lights out this year. I'd start him over both David and Young at this point. I know he had the winning TD completed on him, but he was in position, it was just a good throw and an excellent catch. You're absolutly right. Craft couldn't have had better coverage. The receivers timing was perfect. Jason was much shorter than the receiver. But the coverage was there.

12-05-2007, 10:10 AM	#2
saintsfan1976 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Atlanta Posts: 11,102 Blog Entries: 3	Re: Kaesviharn could get more time Originally Posted by JOESAM2002 You're absolutly right. Craft couldn't have had better coverage. The receivers timing was perfect. Jason was much shorter than the receiver. But the coverage was there. Agreed, but why didn't we take a timeout when they moved Stevens out there??

12-05-2007, 10:20 AM	#3
JOESAM2002 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: CRYSTAL BEACH TEXAS Posts: 4,100	Re: Kaesviharn could get more time Originally Posted by saintsfan1976 Agreed, but why didn't we take a timeout when they moved Stevens out there?? Good question. I wish I had an answer to it.

12-05-2007, 10:34 AM	#4
WhoDat205 Prediction Pain Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Birmingham, AL Posts: 1,082 Blog Entries: 2	Re: Kaesviharn could get more time Originally Posted by saintsfan1976 Agreed, but why didn't we take a timeout when they moved Stevens out there?? Originally Posted by JOESAM2002 Good question. I wish I had an answer to it. I guessing that was sarcasm, right? Because we were out of them. I'm not jumping on the "fire payton" bus, but his use of Time Outs is terrible. He constantly uses TOs in the 3rd quarter to change schemes defensively and it constantly bites us in the butt. I wish someone smarter than I am would do a statistical analysis on what a Time Out is worth, kinda like the economist that did the study saying that teams should go for it on 4th and 10 anywhere past their 35yl. I'd just be interested to see how many yards a TO is worth statistically speaking.
	"defence's personal to allwats double team or watch is over, that one reason why the saints or not any good." - Vador101

12-05-2007, 10:40 AM	#5
JOESAM2002 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: CRYSTAL BEACH TEXAS Posts: 4,100	Re: Kaesviharn could get more time Originally Posted by WhoDat205 I guessing that was sarcasm, right? Because we were out of them. I'm not jumping on the "fire payton" bus, but his use of Time Outs is terrible. He constantly uses TOs in the 3rd quarter to change schemes defensively and it constantly bites us in the butt. I wish someone smarter than I am would do a statistical analysis on what a Time Out is worth, kinda like the economist that did the study saying that teams should go for it on 4th and 10 anywhere past their 35yl. I'd just be interested to see how many yards a TO is worth statistically speaking. Man, can you imagine how many answers there would be to that question? There would be so many things that would change the answer. Like What yard line they are on. What down is it. I think far to many variables to get one firm answer. But boy if you could........