Kaesviharn should stay starting safety

hagan714 · 12-16-2007, 04:57 PM

Bullocks could benefit from watching him play. I don't know if I am ready to give up on him yet.

UK_WhoDat · 12-16-2007, 05:10 PM

Originally Posted by hagan714

Bullocks could benefit from watching him play. I don't know if I am ready to give up on him yet.

Funnily (???) I like Josh Bullocks. And it looked he was coming of age a few weeks ago, IIRC. So yes. Keep Bullocks. But for now, KK is FS. QED

TheDeuce · 12-16-2007, 05:27 PM

Originally Posted by UK_WhoDat

Funnily (???) I like Josh Bullocks. And it looked he was coming of age a few weeks ago, IIRC. So yes. Keep Bullocks. But for now, KK is FS. QED

I don't know what games you were watching a few weeks ago, but in the games I saw, Bullocks was getting embarrased out there. The guy has clearly regressed since his first season, a season when I thought he was going to be a really good player. He's a liability in coverage, and he's not a sure tackler. That's not a good combo in my book.

But I completely agree about KK, that guy is awesome. He's a ballhawk and things just happen when he gets around the ball. He's also a very good tackler, something that this team needs.

UK_WhoDat · 12-16-2007, 06:41 PM

Bullocks: Yes. Over the whole season I would rate him D. But he performed v Tampa Bay (a day when most of the Saints organisation did not)

12-16-2007, 04:57 PM	#1
hagan714 LB Mentallity Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 15,870 Blog Entries: 68	Re: Kaesviharn should stay starting safety Bullocks could benefit from watching him play. I don't know if I am ready to give up on him yet.

12-16-2007, 05:10 PM	#2
UK_WhoDat 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Wherever I lay my hat Posts: 4,001	Re: Kaesviharn should stay starting safety Originally Posted by hagan714 Bullocks could benefit from watching him play. I don't know if I am ready to give up on him yet. Funnily (???) I like Josh Bullocks. And it looked he was coming of age a few weeks ago, IIRC. So yes. Keep Bullocks. But for now, KK is FS. QED
	Last edited by UK_WhoDat; 12-16-2007 at 05:14 PM..

12-16-2007, 05:27 PM	#3
TheDeuce 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,928	Re: Kaesviharn should stay starting safety Originally Posted by UK_WhoDat Funnily (???) I like Josh Bullocks. And it looked he was coming of age a few weeks ago, IIRC. So yes. Keep Bullocks. But for now, KK is FS. QED I don't know what games you were watching a few weeks ago, but in the games I saw, Bullocks was getting embarrased out there. The guy has clearly regressed since his first season, a season when I thought he was going to be a really good player. He's a liability in coverage, and he's not a sure tackler. That's not a good combo in my book. But I completely agree about KK, that guy is awesome. He's a ballhawk and things just happen when he gets around the ball. He's also a very good tackler, something that this team needs.
TheDeuce 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,928

12-16-2007, 06:41 PM	#4
UK_WhoDat 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Wherever I lay my hat Posts: 4,001	Re: Kaesviharn should stay starting safety Bullocks: Yes. Over the whole season I would rate him D. But he performed v Tampa Bay (a day when most of the Saints organisation did not)