Why Bullocks

QBREES9 · 12-23-2007, 10:01 PM

I don't think that I have seen another thread about this, but why didn't KK get the start over Bullocks? Bullocks was out of position all day and was responsible for several of the defensive letdowns, especially in the first half.

Sometimes Coach leaves me scratching my head on his personnel decisions. Especially when KK comes out and proves that he can play the position for 2 games and Bullocks came out today an laid an egg.

Euphoria · 12-23-2007, 10:23 PM

I am sorry I don't have faith in any of our safties. They are all liabilities.

geauxldenhustle25 · 12-23-2007, 10:35 PM

let's see, KK the ball hawk loses the spot to jason david the sequel?!

TheDeuce · 12-24-2007, 01:00 AM

Yeah I'm not really sure what the hell Bullocks was doing in the game. In my eyes, and in the eyes of many a poster here at B&G, KK played markedly better football than any of our safeties. The guy is a ballhawk, a good cover safety, and comes up very well in run support. I remember when Payton came to New Orleans he said he would start whoever offered the team the best chance to win, and that he wouldn't play favorites. Well unless I have absolutely zero ability to assess football talent (which I don't believe to be true, and I hope some of you can vouch for), Payton is not playing the people who give the Saints the best chance to win. Simoneau, Jason David, Bullocks. Those three should never see the field, IMO. But they all start, and they're consistently caught out of positon, off guard, a step behind, and too weak to make an impact hit. PUKE.

By the way, speaking of those three, do we still have the vomiting emoticon?

hagan714 · 12-24-2007, 07:09 AM

I do not know. I do not know. I do not know. WHY?

Tobias-Reiper · 12-24-2007, 02:35 PM

...because you came home early...

BIGEASY504 · 12-24-2007, 04:05 PM

Originally Posted by TheDeuce

Yeah I'm not really sure what the hell Bullocks was doing in the game. In my eyes, and in the eyes of many a poster here at B&G, KK played markedly better football than any of our safeties. The guy is a ballhawk, a good cover safety, and comes up very well in run support. I remember when Payton came to New Orleans he said he would start whoever offered the team the best chance to win, and that he wouldn't play favorites. Well unless I have absolutely zero ability to assess football talent (which I don't believe to be true, and I hope some of you can vouch for), Payton is not playing the people who give the Saints the best chance to win. Simoneau, Jason David, Bullocks. Those three should never see the field, IMO. But they all start, and they're consistently caught out of positon, off guard, a step behind, and too weak to make an impact hit. PUKE.

By the way, speaking of those three, do we still have the vomiting emoticon?

It was Simoneau who couldn't get past when McNabb ran for the 40 yarder because when I TIVO'd it that's right I TIVO'd it), Hollis Thomas gotten double teamed and pushed back and Simoneau ran right up his back and McNabb went straight for the spot that was vacated by Simoneau, We all know Jason David short comings are so do I believe Payton has his favorites HELL YEAH!!!!! These 3 can only be back ups on any other team in the league

TheDeuce · 12-24-2007, 04:27 PM

BigEasy, if you've still got the game TIVO'd, go back and look at the Correll Buckhalter touchdown run. Same thing, Hollis gets double teamed, Simoneau, instead of reading the play, basically runs into the back of Thomas and watches Buckhalter run by him as he's basically getting a piggy-back ride from Hollis.

MatthewT · 12-24-2007, 09:21 PM

Well, at least the Saints have KK for three more seasons. That should give plenty of time for the coaching staff to redeem themselves. Brian Simmons is another the Saints have for two more years. Now the bad part, Shanle is on for three more after this season. Gee...

NEXTPROBOWLER · 12-24-2007, 09:43 PM

i just dont get it, i been a big support of bad luck bullocks, i figure he could turn out to somthin good, but boy has he hit the wall this season, and as far as kk and simmons maybe its somthin at practice for why they dont play.....

12-23-2007, 10:01 PM	#1
QBREES9 Moderator Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: New Haven Ct Posts: 23,985	Why Bullocks I don't think that I have seen another thread about this, but why didn't KK get the start over Bullocks? Bullocks was out of position all day and was responsible for several of the defensive letdowns, especially in the first half. Sometimes Coach leaves me scratching my head on his personnel decisions. Especially when KK comes out and proves that he can play the position for 2 games and Bullocks came out today an laid an egg.

12-23-2007, 10:23 PM	#2
Euphoria 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Hollywood, CA Posts: 7,601 Blog Entries: 5	Re: Why Bullocks I am sorry I don't have faith in any of our safties. They are all liabilities.

12-23-2007, 10:35 PM	#3
geauxldenhustle25 THIS IS HOW WE DO IT Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 53	Re: Why Bullocks let's see, KK the ball hawk loses the spot to jason david the sequel?!

12-24-2007, 01:00 AM	#4
TheDeuce 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,928	Re: Why Bullocks Yeah I'm not really sure what the hell Bullocks was doing in the game. In my eyes, and in the eyes of many a poster here at B&G, KK played markedly better football than any of our safeties. The guy is a ballhawk, a good cover safety, and comes up very well in run support. I remember when Payton came to New Orleans he said he would start whoever offered the team the best chance to win, and that he wouldn't play favorites. Well unless I have absolutely zero ability to assess football talent (which I don't believe to be true, and I hope some of you can vouch for), Payton is not playing the people who give the Saints the best chance to win. Simoneau, Jason David, Bullocks. Those three should never see the field, IMO. But they all start, and they're consistently caught out of positon, off guard, a step behind, and too weak to make an impact hit. PUKE. By the way, speaking of those three, do we still have the vomiting emoticon?
TheDeuce 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,928

12-24-2007, 07:09 AM	#5
hagan714 LB Mentallity Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 15,870 Blog Entries: 68	Re: Why Bullocks I do not know. I do not know. I do not know. WHY?

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

12-24-2007, 02:35 PM	#6
Tobias-Reiper Merces Letifer Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 4,161	Re: Why Bullocks ...because you came home early...

12-24-2007, 04:05 PM	#7
BIGEASY504 100th Post Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 487	Re: Why Bullocks Originally Posted by TheDeuce Yeah I'm not really sure what the hell Bullocks was doing in the game. In my eyes, and in the eyes of many a poster here at B&G, KK played markedly better football than any of our safeties. The guy is a ballhawk, a good cover safety, and comes up very well in run support. I remember when Payton came to New Orleans he said he would start whoever offered the team the best chance to win, and that he wouldn't play favorites. Well unless I have absolutely zero ability to assess football talent (which I don't believe to be true, and I hope some of you can vouch for), Payton is not playing the people who give the Saints the best chance to win. Simoneau, Jason David, Bullocks. Those three should never see the field, IMO. But they all start, and they're consistently caught out of positon, off guard, a step behind, and too weak to make an impact hit. PUKE. By the way, speaking of those three, do we still have the vomiting emoticon? It was Simoneau who couldn't get past when McNabb ran for the 40 yarder because when I TIVO'd it that's right I TIVO'd it), Hollis Thomas gotten double teamed and pushed back and Simoneau ran right up his back and McNabb went straight for the spot that was vacated by Simoneau, We all know Jason David short comings are so do I believe Payton has his favorites HELL YEAH!!!!! These 3 can only be back ups on any other team in the league
BIGEASY504 100th Post Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 487

12-24-2007, 04:27 PM	#8
TheDeuce 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,928	Re: Why Bullocks BigEasy, if you've still got the game TIVO'd, go back and look at the Correll Buckhalter touchdown run. Same thing, Hollis gets double teamed, Simoneau, instead of reading the play, basically runs into the back of Thomas and watches Buckhalter run by him as he's basically getting a piggy-back ride from Hollis.
TheDeuce 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,928

12-24-2007, 09:21 PM	#9
MatthewT 1000 Posts + Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Mississippi Posts: 2,729	Re: Why Bullocks Well, at least the Saints have KK for three more seasons. That should give plenty of time for the coaching staff to redeem themselves. Brian Simmons is another the Saints have for two more years. Now the bad part, Shanle is on for three more after this season. Gee...

12-24-2007, 09:43 PM	#10
NEXTPROBOWLER 100th Post Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Las Vegas Posts: 269	Re: Why Bullocks i just dont get it, i been a big support of bad luck bullocks, i figure he could turn out to somthin good, but boy has he hit the wall this season, and as far as kk and simmons maybe its somthin at practice for why they dont play.....