McKenzie and Branch both on IR

G504 · 12-24-2007, 06:16 PM

I say we convert some wide receivers to DB. They can't be much worse that the ones we got. Plus, if a wild pass comes right to them (which is gonna happen at least 2 or 3 times with the Bears), I want a guy back there who will actually catch it. Forget the dropped passes on offense, I cringe every time we drop a should-be interception. Because 9 times out of 10, the team ends up marching right down the field after that. Our defense is good like 2 or 3 plays per possession. So if those 3 aren't in a row, in one of them has to be a turnover.

12-24-2007, 06:16 PM	#8
G504 100th Post Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Miami Posts: 424	Re: McKenzie and Branch both on IR I say we convert some wide receivers to DB. They can't be much worse that the ones we got. Plus, if a wild pass comes right to them (which is gonna happen at least 2 or 3 times with the Bears), I want a guy back there who will actually catch it. Forget the dropped passes on offense, I cringe every time we drop a should-be interception. Because 9 times out of 10, the team ends up marching right down the field after that. Our defense is good like 2 or 3 plays per possession. So if those 3 aren't in a row, in one of them has to be a turnover.
	http://www.darrylbercegeay.com/wsmith1.jpg