|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by papz I bet this board would be a riot if we took a receiver with one of our first day picks. You know at the end of the game, the team with the most points win. I ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Merces Letifer
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,161
|
Re: Per Rotoworld/ Roy Williams
Originally Posted by papz
![]()
I understand what you are saying, but you can see it 2 ways: The team with the most points at the end of the game had the most because either their offense scored more points than the other team, or their defense didn't allow the other team to score as much points... a couple defensive stops here and there, and not allowing so many 3rd and long conversions, and this season would've gone very differently. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: bossier city
Posts: 56
|
Re: Per Rotoworld/ Roy Williams
i may get the boot from this board for this but i think we should trade will smith. we could get roy williams (and maybe a pick). i realize he maybe our best defensive player but our defense is not good.
this is what we would have to build on for D.....harper, fujita, c grant. now we could let gibbs build his 3-4 OR we draft all db's and bank on having such a strong offense that teams will have to throw to stay in the games with us. i understand that we have a pretty strong offense already but good defenses can hold us down. nobody can hold the patriots down so who cares how good their defense is. besides......if we were that good on offense i believe that our defense would rank 10 spots higher with the same personnel just b/c what is forces teams to do against u to keep up i know it is just a dream but roy williams is our chance to become the most potent offense in the league! un-stop-able!!!!!!! |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
The Professor
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lithonia, GA
Posts: 2,781
|
Re: Per Rotoworld/ Roy Williams
Originally Posted by procto
So why suggest it then? Frankly it makes no sense to me.![]()
The 2000 Baltimore Ravens and the 1985 Chicago Bears won championships with dominating defenses and really mediocre offenses. The opposite hasn't really been done ever. Last year the Colts defense in the regular season sucked rocks. However, in the playoffs, their defense became championship caliber. Look at all the great offenses of the SB era. The Chargers in the 70's, the Colts of today, the Rams of the late 90's, and of course the 2007 Patriots. The teams that won championships had defenses capable of stopping other teams in their tracks. Remember that the Colts won a game against Baltimore in which no TDs were scored. The bottom line is that thinking thematically about offense means that you're not interested in winning a championship. And don't think that the Patriots of today are not in that category. Right now they are a top 5 defense in this league to go along with the #1 offense.
I'm writing this presuming that you are in fact serious. If this is a joke post, then my apologies. SFIAH |
Super Bowl Championships: New Orleans Saints:1, Carolina:0, Atlanta Chokers: STILL ZERO
Only Atlanta choked in an unchokable situation... Life is definitely good. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Merces Letifer
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,161
|
Re: Per Rotoworld/ Roy Williams
Originally Posted by procto
Well, who would want Will Smith? Really? he had a bad year last year. He got handled by all the LTs he faced one-on-one. He wasn't our best defensive player last year, that was Fujita. ![]()
And I would disagree that having a better offense would make tis defense rank any higher... not when your Achilles heel is the pass. |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
The Professor
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lithonia, GA
Posts: 2,781
|
Re: Per Rotoworld/ Roy Williams
Originally Posted by Tobias-Reiper
The Saints have multiple Achilles heels on defense. They give up the big play. They can't consistently get to the QB. They can't get off the field on 3rd down. They don't generate turnovers.![]()
In 2006 they couldn't stop the run. They were the #3 pass defense in the NFL. In 2007 they stopped the run and gave up the pass. The defense will not improve until they stop the run, the pass, and the big play consistently. And they need to generate turnovers. SFIAH |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Resident Swede
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Märsta, Sweden
Posts: 8,030
|
Re: Per Rotoworld/ Roy Williams
If we can take care of our big defensive needs in the FA sur why not. Othewise get young stay young.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Boondock Saint
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: F***ing Atlanta
Posts: 322
|
Re: Per Rotoworld/ Roy Williams
Alright people look at it this way.
If we shore up some defensive areas in FA and we can get him for a 2nd NEXT year would be great. If not then I am worried about pending a first day draft pick on a player that is not as bad of a need as defensive players are. However there is no way to be sure that whoever we draft in the second round would even start. We do not know what the FO is thinking, if Meachem is going to be good then we are fine and do not need Williams. With all the weapons we have Bush in the slot, Moore, Copper, both TE's I think the pick can be spent better elsewhere, unless we can do a lot in Free Agency. Someone said we have a lack of depth at TE. Um, NO we do not. Eric Johnson and Billy MIller are both very, very good TE's. Not great mind you, but they are very good. |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: bossier city
Posts: 56
|
Re: Per Rotoworld/ Roy Williams
its cool saintsfan.....no harsh feelings here
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Nose Digger
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Thibodaux
Posts: 341
|
Re: Per Rotoworld/ Roy Williams
I am with you Papz, on one hand you can get a Ryan and on the other you can get a Lehman....No one knows how it will work out. Last year we taded out of the second round to pick up either Young or Alleman, forget which but they didn't exactly come in right away and make a difference. I like them both for the long term, but we need help right away. Williams is still young, great in my opinion. He had Kitna throwing him the ball with one of the poorest lines in the league. Imagine if he played with Brees. A young reliable, fast wide receiver would be great for our team. To be honest, I don't see why teams don't trade more with picks for proven players who are just a few years in the league.
Free agency hasn't even started yet so I think this argument is a little premature. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|