|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; I'm not really sold on Shockey as a huge improvement to our offense. It seems to me that Colston runs a lot of routes that a TE might. We don't need two such players, do we? However, that said, someone ...
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,423
|
Re: shockey to saints? New Update on Page 6!!
I'm not really sold on Shockey as a huge improvement to our offense. It seems to me that Colston runs a lot of routes that a TE might. We don't need two such players, do we?
However, that said, someone please make it sound sensible that we turn down Harper and our 2nd round pick for Shockey? That seems like a deal for us! Shockey is a proven player at a position of need for us. Harper is an ok safety. Furthermore, in the abstract the value of a Safety and a TE are about the same. If we're just going to take a TE with our 2nd rounder, then why not get Shockey and try and pick up another marginal Safety in the 3rd or 4th? Speculation: maybe the whole Shockey thing is just a part of a plan to trade up with our #1? I don't see how we can trade up from 10 to 2 without giving away the farm. Perhaps our 10 and Shockey and something else get us what we need to get up to 2 overall? Just a thought. |
"... I was beating them with my eyes the whole game..." - Aaron Brooks
|
|
![]() |