Re: would the saints take him if he's there?
 

This is a good point.

We are all bored out of our minds waiting for the draft, so everyone has a trade up, trade down scenario, but staying put and taking Rivers makes the most sense.

No one could complain about the pick, and the front office could say that we drafted both BPA and filled a need.

Re: would the saints take him if he's there?
 

Take him only if he is to be a tackle, guards just isn't worth being drafted in the top 10. If McKelvin is on the board then that is who they should take.

Re: would the saints take him if he's there?
 

Dome Patrol 2??????

If Rivers is there I don't see them skipping him. Way too tempting to build a killer LB Corps.

Jeezus BIG RON, who is the chick! Good Lord!

Re: would the saints take him if he's there?
 

I don't like her hair. But since we are Saints fans it is customary to put a bag over our heads.

Re: would the saints take him if he's there?
 

How come you didnt throw fujitas name in there? you think morgan is better than him?

Re: would the saints take him if he's there?
 

I think Morgan and Vilma both are going to surprise alot of people this year. They both have alot to prove and prove it they will.

Fujita is second string, they'll ask Morgan to take over and as long as he doesn't bang his head against a brick wall the dome patrol will be back.

Re: would the saints take him if he's there?
 

haha she's hot.....i think that if we dont get keith rivers we will start fujita because i really believe that he could start on most teams....he has been the strong point in our linebacking core for the past few years....leave him alone he's a captain...lol...i think we should go after mckelvin if the DTs arent available....rivers would be great but he isnt as important to us as a CB would be