Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Archuleta and Harper?

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; He's also part of the reason we made it to that game (i.e. he was a contributing member of our defense that year). I doubt that he was always out of position. (And before anyone suggests I didn't see the ...

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 05-07-2008, 06:36 PM   #17
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,423
Re: Archuleta and Harper?

He's also part of the reason we made it to that game (i.e. he was a contributing member of our defense that year).

I doubt that he was always out of position. (And before anyone suggests I didn't see the game, I did).

Statistically speaking Bullocks is about where most of the second rate starters in the NFL are. Of course, we could get better, but we could get a lot worse.

I'm starting to think that I just don't understand what people mean when they say "sucks." I'm really coming to believe that means "I don't like so and so, and we could have a better player than so and so" - not much content there.

I can certainly get on board with upgrading that position, but I think we could do much worse than what we have. Was the secondary really that much better the two games KK started (I'm actually just asking that - it isn't rhetorical)? If someone decides to answer that, I'm not going to be swayed by your opinion - I'd like something a little more concrete.

"... I was beating them with my eyes the whole game..." - Aaron Brooks
JKool is offline  
 


Posting Rules


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:39 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts