|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by Budsdrinker With the mad scientist mind of Sean Payton we may see Thomas and Bell in the backfield together with Bush spreadout. Who needs a fullback. Who needs a fullback? The ball carrier. Payton brought Evans in ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Bounty Money $$$
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 5800 Airline Dr. Metairie, LA.
Posts: 24,125
|
Re: Any word on Big Sed
Originally Posted by Budsdrinker
Who needs a fullback? The ball carrier. Payton brought Evans in after releasing a quality fullback so that he could expand his game. We have plays designed for all combinations of the running backs and Payton obviously likes having a blocker for his backs to get behind. Our Backs follow the blocks better now and it is an integral part of the game. Who needs a fullback? Payton does. ![]()
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
A Cajun Transforming TX
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The Woodlands, Texas
Posts: 2,787
|
Re: Any word on Big Sed
Originally Posted by Rugby Saint II
Sarcasm alert! Thought the mad scientist part would give it away. Yes I know we need a lead blocker but I can see Payton using the 3 backs all at once. I see a TE (Thomas)or possible Strief being used as a FB.
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Bounty Money $$$
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 5800 Airline Dr. Metairie, LA.
Posts: 24,125
|
Re: Any word on Big Sed
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Merces Letifer
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,161
|
Re: Any word on Big Sed
Originally Posted by Rugby Saint II
Evans wasn't brought in just to block. He was brought in because he can run routes and he can catch. If it was just blocking, Karney would still be here.![]()
In a pinch, either Streif, Shockey, or Bell could play the part of the blocking fullback. |
![]() |