Re: First Take....
 

Euph... Why is it when I bring up a valid argument, on a issue that I feel is important, you say I'm taking it personally? There are many posts on here, regarding the Saints, that can be regarded as "personal" statements. Thus the whole idea behind a "saints forum". A place to discuss, share, and even vent sometimes. That's what this board has been since I joined it, when did that change?

How boring would this place be, if all we do is come in and talk stats all the time? And depth over rated? Are you serious? COME ON MAN!

Re: First Take....
 

i just wanted you to reply so badly and try to prove me wrong with stats or something else ridiculous you think you could come up with to convince me that i am wrong and have always been that way

or maybe it was from watching the games goof

jared allen>will smith
jared allen>charles grant

pat williams>sed
Pat williams>remi
pat williams>pressley

kevin williams>sed
kevin williams>remi
kevin williams>pressley

AP>PT
AP>bell
AP>bush
AP>hamilton

saints>vikings

Re: First Take....
 

ok, i have some stats myself. The Saints have 1489 rush yards, split between Bell, Thomas, and Bush. The Vikes have 1329, between Peterson, and their back up, with Peterson having 1084 by himself. That means the back up, has only 208 yards on his own. Now, if we are going to say, that if Brees goes down, we would be hurting, you will also have to say the same about Peterson. Either way, we still have more rushing yards, total, and our backs stay fresher longer, because it's not all on one guy to make it happen.

The only edge, that Minnesota has on us, is their D-line, I will give them that, but that's it. Would it be a good game, yes, but over all better than us, is ridiculous.

Re: First Take....
 

So I never do this type of thing but I just had to send an email to that TOOL, and since they wouldn't post it on the show I will post it here for your viewing pleasure.

"So all last week Who Dat nation had to listen to some of your joke NFL
'analysts' talk about how the Saints defense would be no match for New
England, especially the secondary, and then what happened? They Saints
dominated the passing game of Tom Brady and destroyed the Pats. Now,
instead of giving the Saints props we have to deal with talk about the
Vikings being more complete? You are a joke!"

Re: First Take....
 

Excellent mail bro. Doubtful they will even care. ESPN is the VH1 of sports reporting. They are more worried about creating drama, out of situations, instead of just reporting the facts. Like yesterday, reporting something about Tiger Woods, that they read off the TMZ website. What's that all about? What's next, reports from myspace?

Re: First Take....
 

Geez, dude. Don't get so touchy just because I schooled you with the PT-Forte thing :)
I just asked you a question: what are you basing your statements on? That's all. Are you basing them on greater-than signs?

Re: First Take....
 

lmao you sure showed me......

you know what showed me how good PT was? THIS SEASON.....forte was the better running back last year no matter how many stats you spin to go your way.......im over it but you cant seem to drop it.....thats fine tho

i told you i was basing my opinion on the games that ive seen.......im just tired of having to explain myself when i point out several times that its just my opinion......and you try to pretend like my opinion is actually wrong.....maybe you can try to prove me wrong tho....go ahead......you're going to anyway

Re: First Take....
 

I don't try to pretend anything.