|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Delhomme throws ineterception and smiles aferwards. What's up with that?...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-07-2003, 03:30 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,209
|
Delhomme Smiles
Delhomme throws ineterception and smiles aferwards. What's up with that?
|
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
09-07-2003, 03:37 PM | #2 |
100th Post
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 302
|
Delhomme Smiles
Maybe he smiles because it was a touchdown?
|
09-07-2003, 03:39 PM | #3 |
100th Post
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New Iberia
Posts: 124
|
Delhomme Smiles
While I am not an AB basher........he probly learned that from AB.......he seemed to smile every time that happened.
|
09-07-2003, 04:43 PM | #4 |
100th Post
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New Iberia
Posts: 124
|
Delhomme Smiles
Ok so he redeems himself with a game winning drive.
|
09-07-2003, 05:53 PM | #5 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,020
|
Delhomme Smiles
From the Panthers site to you Billy :P
Delhomme means \"the man\" in French, and Jake was just that in leading the Panthers to a come-from-behind 24-23 victory over the Jaguars. |
09-07-2003, 07:28 PM | #6 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,631
|
Delhomme Smiles
Hey Billy, take a look at this:
Comp %: Delhomme 60%, Brooks 65% - advantage Brooks Yards Per Attempt: Delhomme 6.1, Brooks 6 - we\'ll call it a wash Yards Per Completion: Delhomme 10.2, Brooks 9.25 - Advantage Delhomme TD/INT Ratio: Delhomme 3:2, Brooks 1:1 - Advantage Delhomme Fumbles Lost: Delhomme 0, Brooks 1 - Advantage Delhomme Win/Loss: Delhomme W, Brooks L - Advantage Delhomme Brooks has better receivers and a better RB... what\'s the story with THAT? |
09-07-2003, 11:58 PM | #7 |
Resident antediluvian
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,026
|
Delhomme Smiles
Just thought I\'d move this to the top, because this will be interesting come tommorrow.
|
09-08-2003, 01:31 AM | #8 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,020
|
Delhomme Smiles
I am sure this is the one Saintsfan wants to checkout .
http://start.real.com/rd?pid=nfl_rbn...textheight=275 [Edited on 8/9/2003 by saintz08] |
09-08-2003, 03:19 AM | #9 |
Logic Troll
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Southern Louisiana
Posts: 565
|
Delhomme Smiles
And are ya really surprised? If Delhomme can come in AT THE HALF and pull off a win after being handed a 17 POINT DEFECIT... I wonder what he could have done at the half AGAINST the Panthers... Or the Vikings... Or the Bengals...
I didn\'t have to wait to see the Saints game to get pissed off again. I was pissed off as soon as I saw that comeback. He came in, and all of a sudden the team came together. Davis started getting holes from the o-line and using them effectively. He brought the intangibles. He brought leadership. He brought confidence. He brought hope. But look at the bright side. If we go 1-15 we can draft Eli Manning next year... Then we can trade Donte Stallworth and release Joe Horn so he has no one to throw to. Then we can go 1-15 again and draft a good rookie WR. Then by the time he gets good we can trade Eli Manning, forcefeed a 50 year old Doug Flutie enough geritol drag his ass out on the field, and wonder why we lose. AAAAAAAAAAAAUUUUUUUUUUGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
"Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so." -- Douglas Adams.
|
|
09-08-2003, 07:06 AM | #10 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 2,096
|
Delhomme Smiles
While the majority will not bash Brokks, I must admit that I have at times bashed Brooks.
Remembering back 2-3 weeks ago, I posted a note saying Delhomme may not have been ready to start based on limited playing time, it was stated that we will rue the day we let him go. I don\'t was to play Nostradamus, but...... |