Was it as bad...

21Hilliard · 01-24-2010, 11:59 PM

Even Aikmen said the personal foul on the hit after Favre handed off was a bad call. Poor officiating. Scott your bud light wasn't lying to you.

Srgt. Hulka · 01-25-2010, 12:00 AM

Xan, are you kidding me? The refs did everything legally possible to give the game to Faavra! The non-calls were just as bad. There were many flagrant holding violations that were not called against the Vikes. IMO the refs did a piss poor job.

FlexDefense · 01-25-2010, 12:03 AM

Look for the zebra to give even more protection to Manning.

st thomas · 01-25-2010, 12:04 AM

you could take 1 touch down away from them for darn sure

cars4dylan · 01-25-2010, 12:26 AM

The personal fouls on the hits on the QB both looked like horrible calls.

However, they did makeup for them by not calling the hit below the legs on Favre by McCray on the Vilma int. That call could have easily been made after the new rule was introduced to protect the QBs. I've seen the Brady rule overturn several turnovers throughout the year in games.

Finally though, in the end the Vikes had the bad call that hurt them the most on the pass interference that put the Saints that much closer for the game winning field goal.

Srgt. Hulka · 01-25-2010, 12:26 AM

Originally Posted by FlexDefense

Look for the zebra to give even more protection to Manning.

I agree. I was telling my wife the same thing. Now we have two weeks of Peyton Manning love fest. We shall also overcome that!

01-24-2010, 11:59 PM	#11
21Hilliard 100th Post Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Raised on the Bayou - living in DFW Posts: 136	Re: Was it as bad... Even Aikmen said the personal foul on the hit after Favre handed off was a bad call. Poor officiating. Scott your bud light wasn't lying to you.

01-25-2010, 12:00 AM	#12
Srgt. Hulka 1000 Posts + Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Shreveport, LA Posts: 4,417	Re: Was it as bad... Xan, are you kidding me? The refs did everything legally possible to give the game to Faavra! The non-calls were just as bad. There were many flagrant holding violations that were not called against the Vikes. IMO the refs did a piss poor job.

01-25-2010, 12:03 AM	#13
FlexDefense Registered Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 36	Re: Was it as bad... Look for the zebra to give even more protection to Manning.
FlexDefense Registered Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 36

01-25-2010, 12:04 AM	#14
st thomas Site Donor 2018 Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: lafayette Posts: 7,753	Re: Was it as bad... you could take 1 touch down away from them for darn sure

01-25-2010, 12:26 AM	#15
cars4dylan 100th Post Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 106	Re: Was it as bad... The personal fouls on the hits on the QB both looked like horrible calls. However, they did makeup for them by not calling the hit below the legs on Favre by McCray on the Vilma int. That call could have easily been made after the new rule was introduced to protect the QBs. I've seen the Brady rule overturn several turnovers throughout the year in games. Finally though, in the end the Vikes had the bad call that hurt them the most on the pass interference that put the Saints that much closer for the game winning field goal.
cars4dylan 100th Post Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 106

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

01-25-2010, 12:26 AM	#16
Srgt. Hulka 1000 Posts + Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Shreveport, LA Posts: 4,417	Re: Was it as bad... Originally Posted by FlexDefense Look for the zebra to give even more protection to Manning. I agree. I was telling my wife the same thing. Now we have two weeks of Peyton Manning love fest. We shall also overcome that!