|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by Choupique Why on earth any team would get rid of Vilma is way beyond me. Same with Sharper. Thanks Jets and Vikes. Dumbasses. Not really. Both Vilma and Sharper were ill-equipped to fit in the respective defenses. ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,622
|
Re: Vilma was still in the Superdome After 12:00am *and refused to leave*
Originally Posted by Choupique
Not really. Both Vilma and Sharper were ill-equipped to fit in the respective defenses. Vilma was a beast in New York when they ran the 4-3, but wasn't able to use his talents once the Jets went to the 3-4. As GangGreen put it, the lack of a huge NT didn't help.![]()
As for Sharper, he thrives in a defense where he can utilize his ball hawking ability. It requires more of a freelance approach. In Minnesota he was handcuffed by the cover 2. Come to New Orleans he was able to take advantage of two great cover corners allowing him to be able to roam. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,594
|
Re: Vilma was still in the Superdome After 12:00am *and refused to leave*
Originally Posted by AsylumGuido
![]()
Are those teams in the Super Bowl? :/ Their system is inferior. They let a great player go. Period. Ronnie Lott called Sharper "special" but I should listen to you? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,622
|
Re: Vilma was still in the Superdome After 12:00am *and refused to leave*
No they aren't. They came as close as you can get without making it. And, as well as Sharper and Vilma fit our defensive scheme, they simply do not fit in their previous defenses near as well. Sharper and Vilma are great players. And yes, both special. I never said they weren't. But, Sharper isn't a cover two type safety and Vilma is not a 3-4 type linebacker. That is not downplaying their abilities at all.
|
![]() |