|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; As long as they don't put the Saints logo or use their colors they are fine. That is likely true. I'd be leery, however. The potential legal problems are not worth a short term windfall to some folks, is my ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,594
|
Re: What Is This BS Im Hearing About the NFL Thinking They Own "Who Dat?"
The potential legal problems are not worth a short term windfall to some folks, is my point. Many folks are misinformed about copyrights and trademarks. As an example I had someone threaten to sue me for using a word in an article in a arts/culture/music magazine. I referred to cybercafe in a general sense and some twit thought I was stepping on their intellectual property right toes. I will digress before I type the word douchebag. The thing to consider is someone, somewhere would want to sue you if you make money off of who dat. I just want the Saints to win the Super Bowl. I don't give a ratsarse about making money on the deal. :-/ Bootleg Who Dat! |
Last edited by Choupique; 01-28-2010 at 06:54 PM.. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
500th Post
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: London, England
Posts: 580
|
Re: What Is This BS Im Hearing About the NFL Thinking They Own "Who Dat?"
I think it would be great for all the stores to sell black, gold or white shirts with a big 'WHO DAT!' on them. I don't care how big a company you are, you cannot licence words and I have only ever heard of 2 companies that have licenced colours and even then I don't think they would waste time proving that it is the exact same shade. No Fleur-de-Lys, no Saints logos, just a big Who Dat. I'm telling you they couldn't do a thing but everyone would still know what it was about.
|
![]() |