Who Dat nation 1, NFL 0 in Who Dat fight........

gumbeau · 01-30-2010, 07:48 AM

Who Dat Nation 1, NFL 0 in merchandise fight | New Orleans Saints Central - - NOLA.com

And David Vitter was a great help in the very brief fight.

Choupique · 01-30-2010, 07:50 AM

You need to get out more, dbag.

That battle isn't over is my guess. Greed never stops just because you think it has.

gumbeau · 01-30-2010, 07:55 AM

Are you sad you were wrong?

I'm sorry you are sad.

strato · 01-30-2010, 08:03 AM

LOL..geez..yall kiss and make up...

gumbeau · 01-30-2010, 08:06 AM

Who Dat!

strato · 01-30-2010, 08:07 AM

lol..

gumbeau · 01-30-2010, 08:21 AM

Originally Posted by Choupique

You need to get out more, dbag.

That battle isn't over is my guess. Greed never stops just because you think it has.

"Greed" drives both sides in this fight and that is a good thing. If Who Dat was the intellectual property of the NFL in some sort of meaningful way I would be on the side of the NFL. But Who Dat is a creation of the culture of Louisiana.

"Greed" is good. It drives the engine of our economy, ingenuity and progress.

I know you wish for greed to be a pejorative and that is why you use the word greed instead of many other choices for the desire to obtain more wealth.

Choupique · 01-30-2010, 09:44 AM

You may have been misunderstanding what I've meant the whole time so i tried really hard not to dbag you too hard, gumbonehead.

I am not defending the NFL. I've clearly stated that. I think some folks have reading comprehension issues, but I digress.

Again, it isn't all about who dat. Many of the bootleggers are OBVIOUSLY making products that resemble saints imagery and you all know it.

The guy who started the tread obviously has to do stuff here that makes him feel correct in his own mind. Got it. I'm fairly comfortable in my skin.
Sorry to hear the OP isn't regardless if he realizes this thread reveals as much about him as it does any of us.

Try to read what I post, not what you think you read.

gumbeau · 01-30-2010, 10:00 AM

Originally Posted by Choupique

You may have been misunderstanding what I've meant the whole time so i tried really hard not to dbag you too hard, gumbonehead.

I am not defending the NFL. I've clearly stated that. I think some folks have reading comprehension issues, but I digress.

Again, it isn't all about who dat. Many of the bootleggers are OBVIOUSLY making products that resemble saints imagery and you all know it.

The guy who started the tread obviously has to do stuff here that makes him feel correct in his own mind. Got it. I'm fairly comfortable in my skin.
Sorry to hear the OP isn't regardless if he realizes this thread reveals as much about him as it does any of us.

Try to read what I post, not what you think you read.

You are just upset that someone you disagree with politically actually wrote a letter to the NFL (David Vitter).

And you are upset because yesterday you said it was futile to oppose the NFL's lawyers and the next day the NFL backed off from claiming rights to the phrase "Who Dat".

You can try and pretend to be some sort of brilliant mind but you are only average at best. I suspect I nailed you in my first reply when you posted about a moral compass. You are most likely a conspiracy theorist with left wing tendencies. Your posts are generally pessimistic and cynical.

If it were otherwise, you would have been glad Vitter came to the immediate defense of Who Dat no matter your political affiliation and you would have been very happy that the NFL has backed off from its original position to one that is legally defensible (Use of Who dat in combination with actual NFL logos, trademarks etc etc.)

You are more interested in smashing the other side politically than being happy for a good result. You are more interested in trying to prove you are right than admitting Vitter did a good thing and the little guy scored a victory over an "evil corporation".

Who Dat!!!!!

cajunvoodoo · 01-30-2010, 10:56 AM

Reps on that one gumbeau.

01-30-2010, 07:48 AM	#1
gumbeau Where Y'at? Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: The Republic of Texas Posts: 519	Who Dat nation 1, NFL 0 in Who Dat fight........ Who Dat Nation 1, NFL 0 in merchandise fight \| New Orleans Saints Central - - NOLA.com And David Vitter was a great help in the very brief fight.
	Last edited by gumbeau; 01-30-2010 at 08:15 AM.. Reason: Edited title for more clarity in subject

01-30-2010, 07:50 AM	#2
Choupique 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 2,594	Re: Hey Choupique....It wasn't hopeless. Who Dats win! You need to get out more, dbag. That battle isn't over is my guess. Greed never stops just because you think it has.
Choupique 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 2,594	Last edited by Choupique; 01-30-2010 at 07:54 AM..

01-30-2010, 07:55 AM	#3
gumbeau Where Y'at? Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: The Republic of Texas Posts: 519	Re: Hey Choupique....It wasn't hopeless. Who Dats win! Are you sad you were wrong? I'm sorry you are sad.

01-30-2010, 08:03 AM	#4
strato Banned Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: "Little Ole Town in Tejas" Posts: 7,586	Re: Hey Choupique....It wasn't hopeless. Who Dats win! LOL..geez..yall kiss and make up...

01-30-2010, 08:06 AM	#5
gumbeau Where Y'at? Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: The Republic of Texas Posts: 519	Re: Hey Choupique....It wasn't hopeless. Who Dats win! Who Dat!

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

01-30-2010, 08:07 AM	#6
strato Banned Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: "Little Ole Town in Tejas" Posts: 7,586	Re: Hey Choupique....It wasn't hopeless. Who Dats win! lol..

01-30-2010, 08:21 AM	#7
gumbeau Where Y'at? Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: The Republic of Texas Posts: 519	Re: Hey Choupique....It wasn't hopeless. Who Dats win! Originally Posted by Choupique You need to get out more, dbag. That battle isn't over is my guess. Greed never stops just because you think it has. "Greed" drives both sides in this fight and that is a good thing. If Who Dat was the intellectual property of the NFL in some sort of meaningful way I would be on the side of the NFL. But Who Dat is a creation of the culture of Louisiana. "Greed" is good. It drives the engine of our economy, ingenuity and progress. I know you wish for greed to be a pejorative and that is why you use the word greed instead of many other choices for the desire to obtain more wealth.

01-30-2010, 09:44 AM	#8
Choupique 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 2,594	Re: Who Dat nation 1, NFL 0 in Who Dat fight........ You may have been misunderstanding what I've meant the whole time so i tried really hard not to dbag you too hard, gumbonehead. I am not defending the NFL. I've clearly stated that. I think some folks have reading comprehension issues, but I digress. Again, it isn't all about who dat. Many of the bootleggers are OBVIOUSLY making products that resemble saints imagery and you all know it. The guy who started the tread obviously has to do stuff here that makes him feel correct in his own mind. Got it. I'm fairly comfortable in my skin. Sorry to hear the OP isn't regardless if he realizes this thread reveals as much about him as it does any of us. Try to read what I post, not what you think you read.
Choupique 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 2,594

01-30-2010, 10:00 AM	#9
gumbeau Where Y'at? Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: The Republic of Texas Posts: 519	Re: Who Dat nation 1, NFL 0 in Who Dat fight........ Originally Posted by Choupique You may have been misunderstanding what I've meant the whole time so i tried really hard not to dbag you too hard, gumbonehead. I am not defending the NFL. I've clearly stated that. I think some folks have reading comprehension issues, but I digress. Again, it isn't all about who dat. Many of the bootleggers are OBVIOUSLY making products that resemble saints imagery and you all know it. The guy who started the tread obviously has to do stuff here that makes him feel correct in his own mind. Got it. I'm fairly comfortable in my skin. Sorry to hear the OP isn't regardless if he realizes this thread reveals as much about him as it does any of us. Try to read what I post, not what you think you read. You are just upset that someone you disagree with politically actually wrote a letter to the NFL (David Vitter). And you are upset because yesterday you said it was futile to oppose the NFL's lawyers and the next day the NFL backed off from claiming rights to the phrase "Who Dat". You can try and pretend to be some sort of brilliant mind but you are only average at best. I suspect I nailed you in my first reply when you posted about a moral compass. You are most likely a conspiracy theorist with left wing tendencies. Your posts are generally pessimistic and cynical. If it were otherwise, you would have been glad Vitter came to the immediate defense of Who Dat no matter your political affiliation and you would have been very happy that the NFL has backed off from its original position to one that is legally defensible (Use of Who dat in combination with actual NFL logos, trademarks etc etc.) You are more interested in smashing the other side politically than being happy for a good result. You are more interested in trying to prove you are right than admitting Vitter did a good thing and the little guy scored a victory over an "evil corporation". Who Dat!!!!!

01-30-2010, 10:56 AM	#10
cajunvoodoo 100th Post Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Dallas Posts: 119	Re: Who Dat nation 1, NFL 0 in Who Dat fight........ Reps on that one gumbeau.