Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Colts Receivers better than Ours?

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; No, no, no.... You gave me a speech yesterday, what was it, "The only thing a win counts for, is to the bookies in Vegas. The players know what it means." So, according to your own words, a win, is ...

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-02-2010, 05:37 PM   #1
Senior Citizen
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Gulfport, MS
Posts: 3,180
Blog Entries: 1
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?

No, no, no.... You gave me a speech yesterday, what was it, "The only thing a win counts for, is to the bookies in Vegas. The players know what it means."

So, according to your own words, a win, is NOT, just a win. If that were true, you wouldn't be making excuses for us beating the Vikings. Which you have been harping on all week.
SaintPauly is offline  
Old 02-02-2010, 05:57 PM   #2
500th Post
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 825
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?

U know what, people? The Bucs are not near as bad as their record indicates. I have always respected that team, because they can burn you when you least expect. With that said, ALL of our division rivals play each other tough! Real tough! And when our defense is not healthy, well......any given Sunday! Stop dissing the Bucs, Indy! I hope they open a can of "whoopa**" on your Dolts next time they play, and they probably will!
JoanieNTX is offline  
Old 02-02-2010, 06:29 PM   #3
Mrs. Drew Brees
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: The Who Dat Nation (by way of South Dakota)
Posts: 2,276
Blog Entries: 1
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?

Originally Posted by JoanieNTX View Post
U know what, people? The Bucs are not near as bad as their record indicates. I have always respected that team, because they can burn you when you least expect. With that said, ALL of our division rivals play each other tough! Real tough! And when our defense is not healthy, well......any given Sunday! Stop dissing the Bucs, Indy! I hope they open a can of "whoopa**" on your Dolts next time they play, and they probably will!
You're exactly right, Joanie! They're the only team in our division with any REAL bragging rights. And by bragging rights, I mean, a Super Bowl title. If I recall correctly, a few years ago, they had the number one defense in the league. Say what you want about Tampa Bay, but they aren't a pushover team like everyone wants to believe they are.
breesfan27 is offline  
Old 02-02-2010, 06:28 PM   #4
Site Donor
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Lafayette
Posts: 408
Blog Entries: 1
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?

Really are serious, the Saint's have a complete offense they can run the ball
unlike the Colt's, so I guees 100 catches by 1 reciever is not necessary


You have a very strong WR corp, one of the tops in the league, but they are not on the level of the Colts. How many of your guys had 100 receptions this year? How many TD's did your number 4 guy have this past season? Your guys are good, the Colts are just better....numbers don't lie.
Joker is offline  
Old 02-02-2010, 07:22 PM   #5
Senior Citizen
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Gulfport, MS
Posts: 3,180
Blog Entries: 1
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?

THANK YOU Saint Michael! Although, now he's going to say, that stats don't have anything to do with it..... Watch.... Indy is like the greased up deaf guy, he can wiggle his way, out of anything he says.
SaintPauly is offline  
Old 02-02-2010, 08:11 PM   #6
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Canton, Ohio
Posts: 2,685
Blog Entries: 2
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?

ok.....lets get back on topic.....sorry i missed this thread earlier cuz it would've been over a long time ago

reggie wayne and dallas clark had 100 catches during the regular season....they both had 10 TDs

they averaged 12.6 and 11.1 yards per catch respectively

now....none of our receivers had 100 catches....but 1 of them was over 1000 yards receiving with only 70 catches

our top 2 WRs averaged 15.3 and 15.8 ypc......so with that averaged out to 100 catches.....

colston would've had 1533 yards.....wayne only had 1264

henderson would've had 1578.......clark only had 1106

5 WRs on the colts scored TDs....pretty impressive.....except that the saints had 10 players score a receiving TD this season....not including a few dropped TDs by offensive linemen

so while we are guarding garcon, wayne and clark....you guys can guard colston, henderson, meachem, shockey, thomas, moore, reggie, pierre, and dinkins

oh and dont forget that streif is an eligible receiver when he comes in as an extra blocker because we will throw to him

some colts fan asked earlier how good our 4th WR was......

9 TDs.....is that alright?

so lets recap

your top WR is one of the best in the league....but is targeted more times than any WR on our team.....had our top WR been targeted as many times, he would've had a more productive season

your 2nd WR is a TE and had twice as many catches as our 2nd WR......you know what that tells me

your offense is 1 dimensional....you throw to either wayne or clark.....if i were gregg williams i wouldnt worry about collie or garcon or addai.....none of them are threats because the colts either throw it to wayne or clark

so....which WRs would the colts cover......please tell me because id love to tell you how the other 2 are going to rip your defense apart....oh and that running game of yours....tsk tsk

"deal with it or you can go play the saints and get trounced by 30 and you won't have to worry about it."-colin cowherd
CantonLegend is offline  
Old 02-03-2010, 07:11 AM   #7
Faqda Falcons
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ruston, Louisiana
Posts: 3,465
Blog Entries: 3
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?

Originally Posted by CantonLegend View Post
ok.....lets get back on topic.....sorry i missed this thread earlier cuz it would've been over a long time ago

reggie wayne and dallas clark had 100 catches during the regular season....they both had 10 TDs

they averaged 12.6 and 11.1 yards per catch respectively

now....none of our receivers had 100 catches....but 1 of them was over 1000 yards receiving with only 70 catches

our top 2 WRs averaged 15.3 and 15.8 ypc......so with that averaged out to 100 catches.....

colston would've had 1533 yards.....wayne only had 1264

henderson would've had 1578.......clark only had 1106

5 WRs on the colts scored TDs....pretty impressive.....except that the saints had 10 players score a receiving TD this season....not including a few dropped TDs by offensive linemen

so while we are guarding garcon, wayne and clark....you guys can guard colston, henderson, meachem, shockey, thomas, moore, reggie, pierre, and dinkins

oh and dont forget that streif is an eligible receiver when he comes in as an extra blocker because we will throw to him

some colts fan asked earlier how good our 4th WR was......

9 TDs.....is that alright?

so lets recap

your top WR is one of the best in the league....but is targeted more times than any WR on our team.....had our top WR been targeted as many times, he would've had a more productive season

your 2nd WR is a TE and had twice as many catches as our 2nd WR......you know what that tells me

your offense is 1 dimensional....you throw to either wayne or clark.....if i were gregg williams i wouldnt worry about collie or garcon or addai.....none of them are threats because the colts either throw it to wayne or clark

so....which WRs would the colts cover......please tell me because id love to tell you how the other 2 are going to rip your defense apart....oh and that running game of yours....tsk tsk
Nice work, CL. Very nice work.
D_it_up is offline  
Old 02-02-2010, 08:39 PM   #8
500th Post
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Charlotte (Kill me), but born in Gretna.
Posts: 721
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?

And as for the trolls here, let us not forget the absolute douchebaggery from the Vikes fans. This is nothing.
Dasidreidia is offline  
Old 02-02-2010, 09:54 PM   #9
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,594
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?

Douchebagitude would be the proper term for the Purple Pansy Sub Station.

Can't really call them a nation. There are just a few of them in MinnieSooooota.
Choupique is offline  
Old 02-03-2010, 08:26 AM   #10
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,594
Re: Colts Receivers better than Ours?

One word. Sharper

Another word. Harper

Yet another. Greer

Not to mention Gay, Porter, Fujita, Shanle and introducing Malcolm Jenkins.

The Dolts ain't ready for this. They just think they are. Remember
how the Saints shut down the Cardinals excellent WR's?

Who Dat ain't askeeert.

They are going to hit Manning early, often and hard. Mark my words.
Observe and learn, Hater Nation.

Ask Warner and Favre Bean how it worked out for them. The Saints D
wasn't supposed to be able to touch them either.

Errrrrnt. Dolts are going down. Pants on the ground.
Choupique is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/24624-colts-receivers-better-than-ours.html
Posted By For Type Date Hits
The Latest Austin Collie News | SportSpyder This thread Refback 02-02-2010 02:54 PM 2


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:42 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts