New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com - Indy fans... where are the excuses?

New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com (https://blackandgold.com/community/)

- Saints (https://blackandgold.com/saints/)

- - Indy fans... where are the excuses? (https://blackandgold.com/saints/24896-indy-fans-where-excuses.html)

Re: Indy fans... where are the excuses?

It was all vodou spells. I been telling ya'll that for the last week.

I find it ironic that anyone says the Saints have the refs on their side.
Give me a freakin break.

What this Super Bowl is, if anything, is payback for decades of chitty calls AGAINST us.

I would suggest midol or tampons to those whiner idiots. Sorry, I'm too blunt sometimes, I admit.

Re: Indy fans... where are the excuses?

Quote:

Originally Posted by arsaint (Post 205686)

I can really only think of two calls a Colts fan might question.

1) the 2 pt conversion ruling, which in the end did not win the game and was correctly reversed.
2) the offensive PI on 3rd and goal. Even if that had went the other way, the Colts might score with 40 seconds left and still trailing. Our D was giving up some real estate in the end, but SLOWLY. Don't see the game changing even if the Colts recovered an onside kick that everyone would know is coming.

Refs played little part in this game IMHO. What were there, 6 or so total penalties in the game?

It was a well played game by both teams that really boiled down to the turnover margin (Superbowl winner now 32-3 when winning the TO ratio) and a great stop by our defense in the red zone at the end of the game.

If those two are the only two then I call BS, because both were called correctly, and that's no homerism.

1) Lance bobbled and then 'controlled' the ball, over the line and no question IN the end zone. That's 2 points. The Colts player kicked the ball out of his hands after the fact. The BAD CALL was that we had to challenge it to begin with, because the REF is standing 2 feet from the play and blew the call.
2) Minus the offensive PI, that's an INT, because our player was pushed from behind, forcing him to place his foot OB to stay in position. The Refs were right on it.

Re: Indy fans... where are the excuses?

I agree. I'm just pointing out the only two calls that were even remotely close.

I think the refs called a very fair game and were a non-factor in the outcome of the game.

Re: Indy fans... were are the excuses?

Quote:

Originally Posted by RockyMountainSaint (Post 205361)

Hee Hee Hee!!!

We have heard for the last 2 weeks how the Colts are "Warriors".

Well then, "Warriors Come Out And Play"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hey Mark, WHO DAT BABY????

Haha!

http://www.searchviews.com/wp-conten...s/warriors.jpg

Classic!

Re: Indy fans... where are the excuses?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Choupique (Post 205691)

This colts fan does a pretty good job all on his own; http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=26887

Re: Indy fans... where are the excuses?

I don't think the 2 pt conversion changed the game... but i thought that the receiver had to control a catch out of bounds or even AFTER crossing the goal line. I thought that was wrong... but I am no expert.

Jabba

Re: Indy fans... where are the excuses?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jabba (Post 206016)

Crossing the goal line ends the play at that instant. All he had to do was control the ball long enough to cross the plane.

Re: Indy fans... were are the excuses?

I agree,i have been a Saints fan since 1967.This game will make no difference on how Mannings career is defined once he is retired.The Colts fans have more class than most NFL teams fans!!

Re: Indy fans... where are the excuses?

They are a lot classier than Vikings fan. They are also citizens of reality. Pretty good post by that first guy

Re: Indy fans... where are the excuses?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dasidreidia (Post 206129)

Crossing the goal line ends the play at that instant. All he had to do was control the ball long enough to cross the plane.

Right-
That's why I can't believe it wasn't called complete immediately. He had possession TWICE