More Rule Changes As A Result Of The Saints

Dasidreidia · 03-26-2010, 11:47 AM

Either team could take a timeout to void the 10-second runoff

Problem solved.

They're not trying to stick it to us. They just want to make the game safer and "fairer."

On a somewhat related note, the league has considered changing the Super Bowl's alternate name, The Big Show, to The (Brady/Manning/Favre) Show.

Srgt. Hulka · 03-26-2010, 11:51 AM

Originally Posted by mjf150

The NFL also voted to institute a rule that states, "If the clock is stopped in the final minute of either half for a replay review, but would not have stopped without the review, officials will run off 10 seconds before resuming play. Either team could take a timeout to void the 10-second runoff."

So what their telling us is, that the players and the teams will be penalized 10 seconds because the officials are too incompetent to make the correct call the first time? I think thats what I'm reading in this rule. Can anybody clarify that?

homerj07 · 03-26-2010, 11:59 AM

I would love it if these rules backfire on them & their darling teams get screwed by these rules (ie NE, Pits, Dall, etc.)

UK_WhoDat · 03-26-2010, 12:33 PM

Originally Posted by QBREES9

Come on, their not because of the Saints. Its because of the NFL the No Fun League.

Getting more like No Fleur de Lys, more like.

I am hearing the latest new rule is no more than one of Gold, Black, and White on the uniform.

Papa Voodoo · 03-26-2010, 12:57 PM

This is starting to get silly. It's like they are trying to make the game so the losers' feelings don't get hurt. Brett Favre threw an INT...no INT they most likely would have won by a FG. Maybe Adrian McFumbles should hold onto the ball while we're at it.

10 second runoffs...I don't see why this had to come in either. A review is a review. At least a TO will help here (if the team has one). I think there will be a lot less challenges due to coaches trying to hold onto a TO in close games.

Kurt Warner, Brett Favre, and Peyton Manning should all take a ride on the Whaaaaaaambulance with the Vikings fans over at Bungie. I have never heard so much whining in all of my life. It's rediculous.

mjf150 · 03-26-2010, 01:52 PM

Originally Posted by Dasidreidia

Either team could take a timeout to void the 10-second runoff

Problem solved.

Yes, but because we did not have a timeout at the end of the half in the Miami game, the clock would have ran out and the touchdown that changed the momentum of the game would have never happened.

I just find it odd that the NFL made two rule changes as a direct result of two games that the Saints won.

Srgt. Hulka · 03-26-2010, 02:17 PM

Originally Posted by mjf150

I just find it odd that the NFL made two rule changes as a direct result of two games that the Saints won.

I don't find it odd, I find it outrageous!

9thWardDesire · 03-26-2010, 02:58 PM

Just ask Oakland (Tuck Rule) and Pittsburgh (Coin Flip Slip). These rule changes has done nothing more than expose the NFL for who and what they are. The NATIONAL FLIP-FLOP LEAGUE!!

Feel different?

Tobias-Reiper · 03-26-2010, 06:33 PM

Originally Posted by Dasidreidia

Either team could take a timeout to void the 10-second runoff

Problem solved..

Oh, no... the refs call a time out because they cannot make a ruling on the field, and run off 10 seconds off the clock? HELL NO!.
Make a call. If you can't make the call, don't penalize either team.

Tobias-Reiper · 03-26-2010, 06:35 PM

Originally Posted by 9thWardDesire

Just ask Oakland (Tuck Rule) and Pittsburgh (Coin Flip Slip). These rule changes has done nothing more than expose the NFL for who and what they are. The NATIONAL FLIP-FLOP LEAGUE!!

Feel different?

The tuck rule is still the tuck rule. Never was changed.
The coin toss in the Lions-Steelers game had nothing to do with the rules... besides, if there's a team in the 2000s that should be nice to the referees, it is Pittsburgh

03-26-2010, 11:47 AM	#11
Dasidreidia 500th Post Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Charlotte (Kill me), but born in Gretna. Posts: 721	Re: More Rule Changes As A Result Of The Saints Either team could take a timeout to void the 10-second runoff Problem solved. They're not trying to stick it to us. They just want to make the game safer and "fairer." On a somewhat related note, the league has considered changing the Super Bowl's alternate name, The Big Show, to The (Brady/Manning/Favre) Show.

03-26-2010, 11:51 AM	#12
Srgt. Hulka 1000 Posts + Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Shreveport, LA Posts: 4,417	Re: More Rule Changes As A Result Of The Saints Originally Posted by mjf150 The NFL also voted to institute a rule that states, "If the clock is stopped in the final minute of either half for a replay review, but would not have stopped without the review, officials will run off 10 seconds before resuming play. Either team could take a timeout to void the 10-second runoff." So what their telling us is, that the players and the teams will be penalized 10 seconds because the officials are too incompetent to make the correct call the first time? I think thats what I'm reading in this rule. Can anybody clarify that?

03-26-2010, 11:59 AM	#13
homerj07 In Doh We Trust Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Central Florida Posts: 7,027 Blog Entries: 16	Re: More Rule Changes As A Result Of The Saints I would love it if these rules backfire on them & their darling teams get screwed by these rules (ie NE, Pits, Dall, etc.)

03-26-2010, 12:33 PM	#14
UK_WhoDat 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Wherever I lay my hat Posts: 3,947	Re: More Rule Changes As A Result Of The Saints Originally Posted by QBREES9 Come on, their not because of the Saints. Its because of the NFL the No Fun League. Getting more like No Fleur de Lys, more like. I am hearing the latest new rule is no more than one of Gold, Black, and White on the uniform.

03-26-2010, 12:57 PM	#15
Papa Voodoo 1000 Posts + Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 1,633	Re: More Rule Changes As A Result Of The Saints This is starting to get silly. It's like they are trying to make the game so the losers' feelings don't get hurt. Brett Favre threw an INT...no INT they most likely would have won by a FG. Maybe Adrian McFumbles should hold onto the ball while we're at it. 10 second runoffs...I don't see why this had to come in either. A review is a review. At least a TO will help here (if the team has one). I think there will be a lot less challenges due to coaches trying to hold onto a TO in close games. Kurt Warner, Brett Favre, and Peyton Manning should all take a ride on the Whaaaaaaambulance with the Vikings fans over at Bungie. I have never heard so much whining in all of my life. It's rediculous.

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

03-26-2010, 01:52 PM	#16
mjf150 Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 747	Re: More Rule Changes As A Result Of The Saints Originally Posted by Dasidreidia Either team could take a timeout to void the 10-second runoff Problem solved. Yes, but because we did not have a timeout at the end of the half in the Miami game, the clock would have ran out and the touchdown that changed the momentum of the game would have never happened. I just find it odd that the NFL made two rule changes as a direct result of two games that the Saints won.
mjf150 Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 747

03-26-2010, 02:17 PM	#17
Srgt. Hulka 1000 Posts + Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Shreveport, LA Posts: 4,417	Re: More Rule Changes As A Result Of The Saints Originally Posted by mjf150 I just find it odd that the NFL made two rule changes as a direct result of two games that the Saints won. I don't find it odd, I find it outrageous!

03-26-2010, 02:58 PM	#18
9thWardDesire The Owner Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: New Orleans, LA (10/1/13) Posts: 791	Re: More Rule Changes As A Result Of The Saints Just ask Oakland (Tuck Rule) and Pittsburgh (Coin Flip Slip). These rule changes has done nothing more than expose the NFL for who and what they are. The NATIONAL FLIP-FLOP LEAGUE!! Feel different?

03-26-2010, 06:33 PM	#19
Tobias-Reiper Merces Letifer Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 4,161	Re: More Rule Changes As A Result Of The Saints Originally Posted by Dasidreidia Either team could take a timeout to void the 10-second runoff Problem solved.. Oh, no... the refs call a time out because they cannot make a ruling on the field, and run off 10 seconds off the clock? HELL NO!. Make a call. If you can't make the call, don't penalize either team.

03-26-2010, 06:35 PM	#20
Tobias-Reiper Merces Letifer Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 4,161	Re: More Rule Changes As A Result Of The Saints Originally Posted by 9thWardDesire Just ask Oakland (Tuck Rule) and Pittsburgh (Coin Flip Slip). These rule changes has done nothing more than expose the NFL for who and what they are. The NATIONAL FLIP-FLOP LEAGUE!! Feel different? The tuck rule is still the tuck rule. Never was changed. The coin toss in the Lions-Steelers game had nothing to do with the rules... besides, if there's a team in the 2000s that should be nice to the referees, it is Pittsburgh