Re: ESPN's coverage of OT Rule Change
 

Interesting characterization as well with "bi-boardal" or "BI" ! Who's "BI" around here? :???:

Re: ESPN's coverage of OT Rule Change
 

you met a bunch of bi-boardal people friday night--- some of the good ones from over there. ...not me, Im banned--known over there as "He Who Cannot Be Named."

Re: ESPN's coverage of OT Rule Change
 

Ok I'll come out and say that I am bi-boardal. NTTAWWT.

Re: ESPN's coverage of OT Rule Change
 

And I approve of Selma and SpeedyRon's avatar.

Re: ESPN's coverage of OT Rule Change
 

call me crazy, but i dont mind them showing it one bit. i get a big smile everytime i see it.

Re: ESPN's coverage of OT Rule Change
 

you and Elton John.

hahahaha.... howzitgoin Yat?

what in the world is a "NOTTAWATT?" Is that someone that works at Nottaway?

Re: ESPN's coverage of OT Rule Change
 

Actually, that's a bad example. Minnesota won the toss in overtime that year, and had, not one, but two possessions in OT. Atlanta kicked the game winning FG on their second possession in OT, ending the game. The result would have been the same, even if the new OT rules were in place at that time.

If the team that wins the toss fails to score on their opening drive, and the opposing teams scores on the subsequent drive, either by a field goal or by a touchdown, that team wins the game.

Re: ESPN's coverage of OT Rule Change
 

Ask Seinfeld...it is a ghey thing...not that there's anything wrong with that...

Re: ESPN's coverage of OT Rule Change
 

I like the college rule for the college game. But, they should have left the NFL rule alone. If they want to change a stupid rule, how about allowing everyone on the 53 man roster to play every week?

Re: ESPN's coverage of OT Rule Change
 

the NFL and ESPN wanted Favre vs Payton... bottom line.

if the Viqueens kicker had won the game, IMHO, this would not be an issue.

Why did they want Favre?????

SO HE WOULD FINALLY RETIRE!

The "HARTLEY RULE" is now in full effect!