|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; In my opinion, keep the 16 game schedule and keep the roster the current size. There is absolutely no reason for an 18 game season. Oh, except the networks make more money. You're just going to have more players have ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,417
|
In my opinion, keep the 16 game schedule and keep the roster the current size. There is absolutely no reason for an 18 game season. Oh, except the networks make more money. You're just going to have more players have career ending injuries each year. Keep it the way it is.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
500th Post
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Killeen, Tx.
Posts: 932
|
Originally Posted by Srgt. Hulka
I agree completely, plus, it would mean 4 or 5 meaningless games for the #1 seeds, instead of 2 or 3.
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
100th Post
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 487
|
Originally Posted by Srgt. Hulka
We will loose game integrity. With only two preseason games to evaluate rookies, free agents etc. Then (IMO) football will be like basketball and baseball with it’s long drawn out seasons, I don’t watch baseball and I stop watching basketball around midseason and pick up for playoffs. So no to an 18 game season but they may want to increase the roster size. With increased games a team may not have chance of an undefeated season. And with the Saints and Colts resting players last year we may see more of that
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Mrs. Drew Brees
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: The Who Dat Nation (by way of South Dakota)
Posts: 2,276
Blog Entries: 1
|
Originally Posted by Srgt. Hulka
Everything he just said.
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|