Exhibitionist: Christopher Ivory, preseason film star

Danno · 08-29-2010, 07:50 AM

Originally Posted by Repete

Do we keep 4?

We kept 4 last year, so its possible. I think Graham has forced us to keep 4 TE's though, so that may force numbers down elsewhere.

3QB, 4RB, 1FB, 8OL, 6WR, 4TE = 1 too many.

Gotta drop someone.

SmashMouth · 08-29-2010, 07:55 AM

I thought I read somewhere that if a team keeps 3QB's they get an extra roster spot. If so, that could help us.

Danno · 08-29-2010, 08:22 AM

Originally Posted by SmashMouth

I thought I read somewhere that if a team keeps 3QB's they get an extra roster spot. If so, that could help us.

I think thats active gameday. 45 players plus an extra 3rd QB if you have one.

We can still only have a 53 man team roster.

Beastmode · 08-29-2010, 08:59 AM

Ivory looks promising but I'm holding out judgement until he plays in a real game where juking and stiff arming 8 defenders just ain't gonna happen. What scares me about him is he may try and create something when defenses tighten up and put shame on himself where Betts would know better. Then again, Betts likely would not hold up the entire season and we would be on the car lot again in mid season. I say keep both of em' and look at thinning our receivers.

SaintsFan1967 · 08-29-2010, 11:21 AM

Yep I see us keeping 4 RB's.

strato · 08-29-2010, 11:25 AM

Originally Posted by SaintsFan1967

Yep I see us keeping 4 RB's.

I can see this as well...we might run the wildcat....lol

DRsaints · 08-29-2010, 04:33 PM

I can see us keeping 4 RBs with the injury history at the position. As far as running the wildcat, Payton has already said he doesn't really want to take the ball out of Drew Brees' hands, and I don't blame him. WR is probably the position they're looking at. You saw them try out Arrington in special teams, if he could do both he has a much better shot to make the team. Some of these guys who are on the bubble need to be able to play special teams and a position, so I think it'll come down to that.

Pete · 08-29-2010, 04:45 PM

I really dont believe Arrington will flurish in the return game .Chris "poison" Ivory will earn everything he gets. IMO props to our scouting team for finding a dam good RB that the other 31 teams failed to.

DRsaints · 08-29-2010, 04:47 PM

I don't know. Arrington didn't look very good in the return game against the Chargers.

Pete · 08-29-2010, 04:54 PM

I agree it's like he's just too lanky and lacks the shiftiness needed..now once he gets going it may be a different story but from non moving position waiting for the ball to fall out the sky,his initial start up doesn't look too hot.what about that one return he just hit the deck where I thought he had enough room to get some yds.

08-29-2010, 07:50 AM	#11
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,713	Originally Posted by Repete Do we keep 4? We kept 4 last year, so its possible. I think Graham has forced us to keep 4 TE's though, so that may force numbers down elsewhere. 3QB, 4RB, 1FB, 8OL, 6WR, 4TE = 1 too many. Gotta drop someone.

08-29-2010, 08:22 AM	#13
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,713	Originally Posted by SmashMouth I thought I read somewhere that if a team keeps 3QB's they get an extra roster spot. If so, that could help us. I think thats active gameday. 45 players plus an extra 3rd QB if you have one. We can still only have a 53 man team roster.

08-29-2010, 08:59 AM	#14
Beastmode 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 9,126	Ivory looks promising but I'm holding out judgement until he plays in a real game where juking and stiff arming 8 defenders just ain't gonna happen. What scares me about him is he may try and create something when defenses tighten up and put shame on himself where Betts would know better. Then again, Betts likely would not hold up the entire season and we would be on the car lot again in mid season. I say keep both of em' and look at thinning our receivers.
Beastmode 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 9,126

08-29-2010, 11:21 AM	#15
SaintsFan1967 100th Post Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 109	Yep I see us keeping 4 RB's.
SaintsFan1967 100th Post Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 109

08-29-2010, 11:25 AM	#16
strato Banned Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: "Little Ole Town in Tejas" Posts: 7,586	Originally Posted by SaintsFan1967 Yep I see us keeping 4 RB's. I can see this as well...we might run the wildcat....lol

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

08-29-2010, 07:55 AM	#12
SmashMouth I donated, did you? Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Mandeville, LA Posts: 38,044 Blog Entries: 29	I thought I read somewhere that if a team keeps 3QB's they get an extra roster spot. If so, that could help us.

08-29-2010, 04:33 PM	#17
DRsaints 100th Post Join Date: Aug 2010 Posts: 166	I can see us keeping 4 RBs with the injury history at the position. As far as running the wildcat, Payton has already said he doesn't really want to take the ball out of Drew Brees' hands, and I don't blame him. WR is probably the position they're looking at. You saw them try out Arrington in special teams, if he could do both he has a much better shot to make the team. Some of these guys who are on the bubble need to be able to play special teams and a position, so I think it'll come down to that.
DRsaints 100th Post Join Date: Aug 2010 Posts: 166	My Saints blog: http://dr3pts.tumblr.com

08-29-2010, 04:45 PM	#18
Pete • Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Patterson, LA Posts: 1,753	I really dont believe Arrington will flurish in the return game .Chris "poison" Ivory will earn everything he gets. IMO props to our scouting team for finding a dam good RB that the other 31 teams failed to.
	Last edited by Pete; 08-29-2010 at 04:47 PM..

08-29-2010, 04:47 PM	#19
DRsaints 100th Post Join Date: Aug 2010 Posts: 166	I don't know. Arrington didn't look very good in the return game against the Chargers.
DRsaints 100th Post Join Date: Aug 2010 Posts: 166

08-29-2010, 04:54 PM	#20
Pete • Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Patterson, LA Posts: 1,753	I agree it's like he's just too lanky and lacks the shiftiness needed..now once he gets going it may be a different story but from non moving position waiting for the ball to fall out the sky,his initial start up doesn't look too hot.what about that one return he just hit the deck where I thought he had enough room to get some yds.