Delhomme Loses Game 37-17

BillyCarpenter1 · 10-19-2003, 04:46 PM

Delhomme loses in that stat that matters most -- Wins and losses. Right?

BrooksMustGo · 10-19-2003, 05:33 PM

Yep, he lost. to the same team that beat the tar out of us.
Still 362 yards, 2 tds and no ints is a pretty good performance for anyone. I won\'t knock Jake for losing to McNair when the Titans D can shut down nearly anyone\'s running game.

BillyCarpenter1 · 10-19-2003, 05:35 PM

Jake got most of his yardage in the second half after the Titans starting playing a prevent defense. Meaningless stats!!

seraph33 · 10-19-2003, 06:04 PM

Well Billy why don\'t you recognize this when we say the same the about Brooks?
I can see what you are trying to argue but it\'s a weak argument give it up.

BillyCarpenter1 · 10-19-2003, 06:05 PM

Now why can\'t I use the same \"crazy\" logic everyone else does?

seraph33 · 10-19-2003, 06:11 PM

because you completely disagree with it when it is brought up about Aaron Brooks, and now use it on Delhomme. It is the truth if a QB is playing from behind and the defense goes prevent, the numbers do inflate the performance. You know this whether you admit it or not. That and the the tone of your post is extremely condescending. Again your just picking a fight.

BillyCarpenter1 · 10-19-2003, 06:14 PM

because you completely disagree with it when it is brought up about Aaron Brooks, and now use it on Delhomme. It is the truth if a QB is playing from behind and the defense goes prevent, the numbers do inflate the performance. You know this whether you admit it or not. That and the the tone of your post is extremely condescending. Again your just picking a fight.

Then please post this kind of thing about Delhomme so I want have to skippy.

seraph33 · 10-19-2003, 06:16 PM

I didn\'t watch Delhomme play so how do I know what happened. I didn\'t know his stats until someone posted them. If that is how it went down then yeah his numbers probably do inflate his performance.

BillyCarpenter1 · 10-19-2003, 06:18 PM

Well, considering they lost 38-17 that might be a clue for you?

seraph33 · 10-19-2003, 06:21 PM

And what are you saying. In the \"wins and losses column\" how good did Mr. Brooks fare against the Titans. Man just give it up. I\'m not even going to waste my breath debating this with you.

10-19-2003, 04:46 PM	#1
BillyCarpenter1 Banned Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 2,209	Delhomme Loses Game 37-17 Delhomme loses in that stat that matters most -- Wins and losses. Right?
BillyCarpenter1 Banned Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 2,209

10-19-2003, 05:33 PM	#2
BrooksMustGo 1000 Posts + Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 1,762	Delhomme Loses Game 37-17 Yep, he lost. to the same team that beat the tar out of us. Still 362 yards, 2 tds and no ints is a pretty good performance for anyone. I won\'t knock Jake for losing to McNair when the Titans D can shut down nearly anyone\'s running game.

10-19-2003, 05:35 PM	#3
BillyCarpenter1 Banned Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 2,209	Delhomme Loses Game 37-17 Jake got most of his yardage in the second half after the Titans starting playing a prevent defense. Meaningless stats!!
BillyCarpenter1 Banned Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 2,209

10-19-2003, 06:04 PM	#4
seraph33 Registered Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Baton Rouge Posts: 68	Delhomme Loses Game 37-17 Well Billy why don\'t you recognize this when we say the same the about Brooks? I can see what you are trying to argue but it\'s a weak argument give it up.

10-19-2003, 06:05 PM	#5
BillyCarpenter1 Banned Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 2,209	Delhomme Loses Game 37-17 Now why can\'t I use the same \"crazy\" logic everyone else does?
BillyCarpenter1 Banned Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 2,209

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

10-19-2003, 06:11 PM	#6
seraph33 Registered Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Baton Rouge Posts: 68	Delhomme Loses Game 37-17 because you completely disagree with it when it is brought up about Aaron Brooks, and now use it on Delhomme. It is the truth if a QB is playing from behind and the defense goes prevent, the numbers do inflate the performance. You know this whether you admit it or not. That and the the tone of your post is extremely condescending. Again your just picking a fight.

10-19-2003, 06:14 PM	#7
BillyCarpenter1 Banned Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 2,209	Delhomme Loses Game 37-17 because you completely disagree with it when it is brought up about Aaron Brooks, and now use it on Delhomme. It is the truth if a QB is playing from behind and the defense goes prevent, the numbers do inflate the performance. You know this whether you admit it or not. That and the the tone of your post is extremely condescending. Again your just picking a fight. Then please post this kind of thing about Delhomme so I want have to skippy.
BillyCarpenter1 Banned Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 2,209

10-19-2003, 06:16 PM	#8
seraph33 Registered Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Baton Rouge Posts: 68	Delhomme Loses Game 37-17 I didn\'t watch Delhomme play so how do I know what happened. I didn\'t know his stats until someone posted them. If that is how it went down then yeah his numbers probably do inflate his performance.

10-19-2003, 06:18 PM	#9
BillyCarpenter1 Banned Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 2,209	Delhomme Loses Game 37-17 Well, considering they lost 38-17 that might be a clue for you?
BillyCarpenter1 Banned Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 2,209

10-19-2003, 06:21 PM	#10
seraph33 Registered Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Baton Rouge Posts: 68	Delhomme Loses Game 37-17 And what are you saying. In the \"wins and losses column\" how good did Mr. Brooks fare against the Titans. Man just give it up. I\'m not even going to waste my breath debating this with you.