|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by Mr Magic The only thing I agree with those tools is that the hit was dirty. Stewart was defenseless and Sharper went for the head. By definition of the new rules it's a dirty hit. Sharper's pockets ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
10000 POST CLUB
|
Originally Posted by Mr Magic
![]()
![]() A. Sharper lead with his shoulder, not his helmet. There was helmet to helmet contact, but Sharper's head was up and looking at his target. B. Stewart was the friggin ball-carrier for crying out loud!! Not like he was "defenseless". Sharper was aiming to jar the ball loose - you know, something all players do... C. Stewart wasn't down. No knee, no elbow, nothing. If you remember the call was reversed to a fumble. ! |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
10000 POST CLUB
|
Originally Posted by Mr Magic
So....Care to respond to any of the facts that have been presented in opposition to your "arguments"? Or will you just keep on throwing out wild, baseless, accusations?![]()
Maybe you should stick to funny pictures of cats and leave the debates to the big boys. Not 'smack talk', just a ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 55
|
Originally Posted by Mr Magic
The cat pictures, talking about foreverfan and he posts the cats...![]()
I even forgot what ya'll we're arguing about ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
10000 POST CLUB
|
Which - again - has nothing to do with your comments regarding Sharper in this post. Let's let this one die Magic... I'm tired of coming back, hoping to find a decent response that makes me re-think my position.
|
Last edited by saintsfan1976; 11-09-2010 at 06:17 PM.. |
|
![]() |