Apologies to Pierre Thomas

Danno · 12-29-2010, 09:29 AM

Rewatched the game last night and I was right, he was never triple teamed.

To my surprise he was never double teamed either.

And I was quite shocked that on 2 plays no one followed him at all when he went in motion. He was 0 covered (well sorta', they were playing zone)

The Reggie exaggerations are getting ridiculous guys. They're bordering on Chuck Norris jokes, only some of you think they're real.

CashAndFlash · 12-29-2010, 09:30 AM

Originally Posted by Danno

Rewatched the game last night and I was right, he was never triple teamed.

To my surprise he was never double teamed either.

And I was quite shocked that on 2 plays no one followed him at all when he went in motion. He was 0 covered (well sorta', they were playing zone)

The Reggie exaggerations are getting ridiculous guys. They're bordering on Chuck Norris jokes, only some of you think they're real.

you may be a truth addict, danno, but you're smoking low-grade schwag, and missing the bigger point.

we are a much, much better team with Reggie, than without him.

Danno · 12-29-2010, 09:51 AM

Originally Posted by CashAndFlash

you may be a truth addict, danno, but you're smoking low-grade schwag, and missing the bigger point.

we are a much, much better team with Reggie, than without him.

I don't disagree with that at all.

WE ARE a better team with him. But he doesn't get triple-teamed all the time.

I'm positive you are missing my point.

CashAndFlash · 12-29-2010, 09:54 AM

Originally Posted by Danno

I don't disagree with that at all.

WE ARE a better team with him. But he doesn't get triple-teamed all the time.

I'm positive you are missing my point.

No, i'm not danno, but does it really matter?

Danno · 12-29-2010, 09:59 AM

Originally Posted by CashAndFlash

No, i'm not danno, but does it really matter?

I think you are.

My point is simple, Reggie does not get triple-teamed every play.

What does that have to do with whether we're better team with him than without him?

Answer-> It has nothing to do with it at all, therefore you are missing the point.

CashAndFlash · 12-29-2010, 10:00 AM

so in other words, you can count to three.

you have no point. you're wrong.

Danno · 12-29-2010, 10:04 AM

Originally Posted by CashAndFlash

so in other words, you can count to three.

you have no point. you're wrong.

So in other words, you realize you're wrong and you're being childish about it.

My point was 100% correct.

CashAndFlash · 12-29-2010, 10:21 AM

Originally Posted by Danno

So in other words, you realize you're wrong and you're being childish about it.

My point was 100% correct.

No. my point is that you're arguing geometry, but that football is a chess match.

Grow up.

subguy · 12-29-2010, 11:12 AM

All of this is strictly opinion...stats don't weigh in favor of Bush's contribution. The same could be said for Thomas. Maybe what both guys bring to the table is what is less obvious. I am not a Bush fan and I am a PT fan. This does not mean that they can't play on the same team, it is strictly my opinion. I would like to see what we could do with Ivory and PT operating in the same backfield. PT is great with the wheel and swing passes and Ivory is coming into his own as a solid back.

Danno · 12-29-2010, 11:19 AM

Originally Posted by CashAndFlash

No. my point is that you're arguing geometry, but that football is a chess match.

Grow up.

WTF do you mean by grow up? Just because you're wrong don't take it personally.

I'm fully grown, and on point.

12-29-2010, 09:30 AM	#62
CashAndFlash Banned Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: 30 miles from Paradis Posts: 602 Blog Entries: 1	Originally Posted by Danno Rewatched the game last night and I was right, he was never triple teamed. To my surprise he was never double teamed either. And I was quite shocked that on 2 plays no one followed him at all when he went in motion. He was 0 covered (well sorta', they were playing zone) The Reggie exaggerations are getting ridiculous guys. They're bordering on Chuck Norris jokes, only some of you think they're real. you may be a truth addict, danno, but you're smoking low-grade schwag, and missing the bigger point. we are a much, much better team with Reggie, than without him.

12-29-2010, 09:51 AM	#63
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,723	Originally Posted by CashAndFlash you may be a truth addict, danno, but you're smoking low-grade schwag, and missing the bigger point. we are a much, much better team with Reggie, than without him. I don't disagree with that at all. WE ARE a better team with him. But he doesn't get triple-teamed all the time. I'm positive you are missing my point.

12-29-2010, 09:54 AM	#64
CashAndFlash Banned Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: 30 miles from Paradis Posts: 602 Blog Entries: 1	Originally Posted by Danno I don't disagree with that at all. WE ARE a better team with him. But he doesn't get triple-teamed all the time. I'm positive you are missing my point. No, i'm not danno, but does it really matter?

12-29-2010, 09:59 AM	#65
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,723	Originally Posted by CashAndFlash No, i'm not danno, but does it really matter? I think you are. My point is simple, Reggie does not get triple-teamed every play. What does that have to do with whether we're better team with him than without him? Answer-> It has nothing to do with it at all, therefore you are missing the point.

12-29-2010, 10:04 AM	#67
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,723	Originally Posted by CashAndFlash so in other words, you can count to three. you have no point. you're wrong. So in other words, you realize you're wrong and you're being childish about it. My point was 100% correct.

12-29-2010, 09:29 AM	#61
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,723	Rewatched the game last night and I was right, he was never triple teamed. To my surprise he was never double teamed either. And I was quite shocked that on 2 plays no one followed him at all when he went in motion. He was 0 covered (well sorta', they were playing zone) The Reggie exaggerations are getting ridiculous guys. They're bordering on Chuck Norris jokes, only some of you think they're real.

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

12-29-2010, 10:00 AM	#66
CashAndFlash Banned Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: 30 miles from Paradis Posts: 602 Blog Entries: 1	so in other words, you can count to three. you have no point. you're wrong.

12-29-2010, 10:21 AM	#68
CashAndFlash Banned Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: 30 miles from Paradis Posts: 602 Blog Entries: 1	Originally Posted by Danno So in other words, you realize you're wrong and you're being childish about it. My point was 100% correct. No. my point is that you're arguing geometry, but that football is a chess match. Grow up.

12-29-2010, 11:12 AM	#69
subguy 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: FL Posts: 2,096	All of this is strictly opinion...stats don't weigh in favor of Bush's contribution. The same could be said for Thomas. Maybe what both guys bring to the table is what is less obvious. I am not a Bush fan and I am a PT fan. This does not mean that they can't play on the same team, it is strictly my opinion. I would like to see what we could do with Ivory and PT operating in the same backfield. PT is great with the wheel and swing passes and Ivory is coming into his own as a solid back.

12-29-2010, 11:19 AM	#70
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,723	Originally Posted by CashAndFlash No. my point is that you're arguing geometry, but that football is a chess match. Grow up. WTF do you mean by grow up? Just because you're wrong don't take it personally. I'm fully grown, and on point.