01-03-2011, 03:14 PM
|
#23
|
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 7,601
|
Originally Posted by Budsdrinker
Changing the seeding would be nice but it will not happen. But saying you don't derserve a home game without winning your division isn't right either because technically winning your division doesn't mean you won the most games against your division. Just look at the Raiders. They are the first team in 40 years that go 6-0 against their division and miss the playoffs. So with that said, basically it's the team with the most overall wins that wins the division which now lets you argue against the way the current seeding is done in my opinion.
WOW, I didn't see that. Now I have to rethink my whole view on this subject.
I still feel the system isn't broke at all and it encourages teams to go out and win every game not just those six.
With this logic Raiders should be complaining like mad, for them the system is broke. Technically the Raiders should be the Division Champs and should represent their division.
|
|
|
|