|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; I'm having withdrawal symptoms. I watch last years Super Bowl last night just to try to cure it. Who else thinks that if we would have had a slightly above average running back this year, LT would have fit nicely, ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Not here 2agree
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 712
|
Totally sucks ... and the running game
I'm having withdrawal symptoms. I watch last years Super Bowl last night just to try to cure it.
Who else thinks that if we would have had a slightly above average running back this year, LT would have fit nicely, everything would have been better. Brees doesn't throw all those picks (b/c we have a running game) Red Zone % dramtactically better even on defense - we would have scored more so it's way easier when the opponent is in constant "catch-up" mode. Time of possesion would have been way better etc... Just somebody who would have lasted all season (very important) and could have at least been a threat between the tackles, on the screen, and in pass protection. Nothing else needed to have changed. With this, we would have been hosting the NFC Championship game this weekend. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
100th Post
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 196
|
If our RBs were healthy, it would have been huge, Still need to upgrade the front 7 on defense.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Site Donor 2018
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: lafayette
Posts: 7,753
|
we scored 36 and the defense gave up 41, still think its defense we need more adjstments to.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Site Donor
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,589
|
Originally Posted by st thomas
This is true but we had a top 10 defense for the first time in years. I don't think anyone in their wildest dreams would've imagined that we'd give up 41 offensive points to the Suckhawks. ![]()
I think with a better running game, we control the ball better, Drew gives up less picks, and the offense scores more points. Still, I agree with you that we need to make more adjustments on defense. |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Site Donor 2018
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: lafayette
Posts: 7,753
|
Originally Posted by 44Champs
finally someone somewhat agrees with me. lol its all true what u r saying also about a running game would have helped. the top ten showing is great but it was a bottom feeder against the seaturds.
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Truth Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,748
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Truth Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,748
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Site Donor 2018
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: lafayette
Posts: 7,753
|
tell me we need better offense then because we can't seem to keep seattles defense out of our backfield for that playoff game danno. if our defense pressures hassbeck like brady got pressured for only a couple more times during that game and we would have been watching saints football for 1 more week. do u agree with that?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Truth Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,748
|
I'm comparing situations, and pointing out that you don't make wholesale changes based on one game. You have to look at the big picture and quit over-reacting to one game, which many are.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Truth Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,748
|
|
![]() |