Move over Bushrod, Here Comes Charlie Brown!!!!

MatthewT · 02-05-2011, 02:05 AM

Honestly, we do not know what Charlie Brown brings to the table. The good news is he has a year of training under his belt. Very nice luxury to be able to sit a rookie for a year and get him ready. I say let Brown and Bushrod battle it out, may the best man win.

saints1234 · 02-05-2011, 12:11 PM

........................and may that best man be CB

TheDeuce · 02-05-2011, 12:14 PM

Originally Posted by Speedy Ron

if charlie was so good he would have made an appearance this year. why do people always think the back up is better?!?!?!

This.

saintsfan601 · 02-05-2011, 01:30 PM

I think we should trade Bushrod to the Redskins for a 3rd round pick.

Danno · 02-05-2011, 03:42 PM

Originally Posted by Speedy Ron

if charlie was so good he would have made an appearance this year. why do people always think the back up is better?!?!?!

Because occasionally they are?

Nicks was a back-up, took over for Nesbit
Jenkins was a back-up, took over for Sharper
PT was a back-up, took over for Bush
Ivory was a back-up, took over everyone
Goodwin was a back-up, took over for Faine
Bushrod was a back-up, took over for Brown
Deuce was a back-up, took over for Williams

dizzle88 · 02-05-2011, 08:04 PM

Originally Posted by Danno

Because occasionally they are?

Nicks was a back-up, took over for Nesbit
Jenkins was a back-up, took over for Sharper
PT was a back-up, took over for Bush
Ivory was a back-up, took over everyone
Goodwin was a back-up, took over for Faine
Bushrod was a back-up, took over for Brown
Deuce was a back-up, took over for Williams

I think the only backup on that list that wasnt better than the starter was Bushrod over Brown.
In my opinion, even though Brown would occasionally get tagged with the ole false start penalty, I never once saw him get bull rushed into drew, you could always count that brown would destroy the DE in pass coverage, he was a damn good LT.
now I'm glad we have the draft pick that we got for trading him, still doesn't diminish the fact that brown was alot better than Bushrod.

TheDeuce · 02-06-2011, 02:46 PM

You can never have too much OL depth. We need to keep both Bushrod and Brown, and hope that Brown develops into a star. Bushrod, however, is a very serviceable LT. Not great, but the OL was pretty good this year and definitely not the reason we lost in the first round.

02-05-2011, 12:14 PM	#13
TheDeuce 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,922	Originally Posted by Speedy Ron if charlie was so good he would have made an appearance this year. why do people always think the back up is better?!?!?! This.
TheDeuce 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,922

02-05-2011, 03:42 PM	#15
Danno Site Donor 2014 Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,447	Originally Posted by Speedy Ron if charlie was so good he would have made an appearance this year. why do people always think the back up is better?!?!?! Because occasionally they are? Nicks was a back-up, took over for Nesbit Jenkins was a back-up, took over for Sharper PT was a back-up, took over for Bush Ivory was a back-up, took over everyone Goodwin was a back-up, took over for Faine Bushrod was a back-up, took over for Brown Deuce was a back-up, took over for Williams

02-05-2011, 08:04 PM	#16
dizzle88 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 9,766	Originally Posted by Danno Because occasionally they are? Nicks was a back-up, took over for Nesbit Jenkins was a back-up, took over for Sharper PT was a back-up, took over for Bush Ivory was a back-up, took over everyone Goodwin was a back-up, took over for Faine Bushrod was a back-up, took over for Brown Deuce was a back-up, took over for Williams I think the only backup on that list that wasnt better than the starter was Bushrod over Brown. In my opinion, even though Brown would occasionally get tagged with the ole false start penalty, I never once saw him get bull rushed into drew, you could always count that brown would destroy the DE in pass coverage, he was a damn good LT. now I'm glad we have the draft pick that we got for trading him, still doesn't diminish the fact that brown was alot better than Bushrod.
dizzle88 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 9,766

02-06-2011, 02:46 PM	#17
TheDeuce 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,922	You can never have too much OL depth. We need to keep both Bushrod and Brown, and hope that Brown develops into a star. Bushrod, however, is a very serviceable LT. Not great, but the OL was pretty good this year and definitely not the reason we lost in the first round.
TheDeuce 1000 Posts + Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,922

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

02-05-2011, 02:05 AM	#11
MatthewT 1000 Posts + Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Mississippi Posts: 2,502	Honestly, we do not know what Charlie Brown brings to the table. The good news is he has a year of training under his belt. Very nice luxury to be able to sit a rookie for a year and get him ready. I say let Brown and Bushrod battle it out, may the best man win.

Latest Blogs
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey This is the year Last Blog: 11-25-2022 By: neugey

02-05-2011, 12:11 PM	#12
saints1234 WHODaT#7 Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Crowley Posts: 142	........................and may that best man be CB

02-05-2011, 01:30 PM	#14
saintsfan601 100th Post Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Meridian MS Posts: 259	I think we should trade Bushrod to the Redskins for a 3rd round pick.