Loomis on the prospect of drafting Ingram

jeanpierre · 04-27-2011, 12:52 PM

Originally Posted by Danno

I disagree.

Sincerely,
Deuce McAllister

I Loved Deuce, but...

Deuce McAllister, RB at NFL.com

Eight (8) Total Years with four (4) productive years (over 1000 RuYd)

Danno · 04-27-2011, 01:25 PM

Originally Posted by jeanpierre

I Loved Deuce, but...

Deuce McAllister, RB at NFL.com

Eight (8) Total Years with four (4) productive years (over 1000 RuYd)

Good point, however...

4 very productive years is still better than our other 1st round picks this century... Williams, Sullivan, Stallworth, Grant, Brown, Bush and Meachem.

If we get 6-8 productive years out of Ingram then we freaking stole him at pick 24.

04-27-2011, 12:52 PM	#1
jeanpierre Site Donor 2018 Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Thibodaux Posts: 43,543 Blog Entries: 39	Originally Posted by Danno I disagree. Sincerely, Deuce McAllister I Loved Deuce, but... Deuce McAllister, RB at NFL.com Eight (8) Total Years with four (4) productive years (over 1000 RuYd)

04-27-2011, 01:25 PM	#2
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,748	Originally Posted by jeanpierre I Loved Deuce, but... Deuce McAllister, RB at NFL.com Eight (8) Total Years with four (4) productive years (over 1000 RuYd) Good point, however... 4 very productive years is still better than our other 1st round picks this century... Williams, Sullivan, Stallworth, Grant, Brown, Bush and Meachem. If we get 6-8 productive years out of Ingram then we freaking stole him at pick 24.