Shootin' down another arguement.......(WhoDat)

BillyC · 12-16-2003, 09:49 AM

Billy, I gotta ask...what do you do all day? Please don\'t take any offense by this, but I\'m just wondering, considering the amount of times you post and all the time you take to research these stats.

I have an office equipement company. B&G is just my side job. It would be hard for me to be a Louisiana congressman, considering I live in Mississippi. But, y\'all can send in contributions it ya want.......... :P

seraph33 · 12-16-2003, 02:42 PM

Wow Billy C I love how you always post up QB ratings to compare AB to the elite of the NFL. Too bad FUMBLES don\'t factor into QB ratings. That would give AB alot more than 8 turnovers this year.

Also Billy, I loved your falsifing some of the statistics on Delhomme last week. I know you said you just got them off of another post but still one has to wonder.

seraph33 · 12-16-2003, 02:46 PM

All in fun Gator. I don\'t take this stuff that seriously anymore. People have their opinions. More power to \'em. I\'m just playin\' around with WhoDat. If folks wanna gang up on me.........then it\'s ok.

that is untill AB has another horrible game.

You are such a contradiction. You\'re like the kid in middle school who picks on everyone else then when people pick back you go off to tell the teacher. Just can\'t take your own medicine.

BillyC · 12-16-2003, 02:48 PM

Wow Billy C I love how you always post up QB ratings to compare AB to the elite of the NFL. Too bad FUMBLES don\'t factor into QB ratings. That would give AB alot more than 8 turnovers this year.

Also Billy, I loved your falsifing some of the statistics on Delhomme last week. I know you said you just got them off of another post but still one has to wonder.

I love how you go after me. I\'m not the one who said Brooks needed to be in the top 5 in quarterback rankings. I also provided a link to the Jake Delhomme stats. I don\'t make things up. I\'m guilty of not verifing the stats, but that\'s about it.

If you have a problem with the way QB\'s are ranked, you should talk to the NFL about that, not me. I don\'t make the criteria up.

[Edited on 16/12/2003 by JOESAM2002]

seraph33 · 12-16-2003, 03:08 PM

you chose criteria that doesn\'t tell the whole story. You post the stats, print up the \"8\" ints in bold to prove your point but completely leave out the # of fumbles. And the only reason I\'m \"going after you\" is b/c of how you present yourself on this board. AB has a few weeks of bad games and you\'re saying that you are taking a break from the board, everyone is out to get me. AB has ONE monster game and you are back everyone who thought differently than you. If you wouldn\'t present yourself as such , people would actually listen to what you have to say and respect your opinions even if it differed from their own. Then we could actually have a good debate with you, but whenever someone (at least when I do this) brings up counter points to your statements, YOU rarely bring any substantial counters. Most of the time on . Then, of course, anytime , you were just \"joking around\". Yeah that line is getting old. Billy C. I personally like the fact that the board doesn\'t agree. I actually like the fact that you tend to have the polar opposite opinion to my own. It gives everyone something to debate about. Still the way you come off , annoys the hell out of me.

[Edited on 16/12/2003 by seraph33]

No need for personal attacking.

[Edited on 16/12/2003 by JOESAM2002]

BillyC · 12-16-2003, 03:17 PM

seraph33 -- Again, you go after me and bring nothing substantive to what the topic is about. Which is, AB is ranked # 6 in the NFL. I\'ll not be sucked into personal attacks or anything that will remotely resemble that. Who cares what you think of me or anyone else. I can send you my personal e-mail or better yet my address, if you would like to tell me in person what you think of me? I\'ll continue to post

You seem to be confused and think my post was about Brooks fumbling the ball. It wasn\'t!! It was about Brooks improvement in the passing game. It was about Brooks being ranked where so many have said he needed to be.

Been there. Done that.

[Edited on 16/12/2003 by JOESAM2002]

BillyC · 12-16-2003, 03:47 PM

Joe,

I saw you edited my posts. I think I kept them very clean. I don\'t mind that you edited the way you saw fit though. I\'m really trying. You have actually gotten very good at editing the posts and making them still make sense. Sometimes too good at it --

Cassady37 · 12-16-2003, 04:10 PM

Haven\'t any of you figured it out yet??!!! BillyC is really Haslett! Look at all his stats and arguments over the coarse of this board. Who does he defend the most?? Why does it seem like he\'s obsessive?? It\'s because he is really Haslett! Only Haslett would have this much time on his hands, check our team\'s record, he\'s not spending that much time coaching. Back away Haslett, go to the chaclkboard...let\'s try to make the playoffs...do some coaching....

BillyC · 12-16-2003, 04:14 PM

It\'s ok Cassady37. You will be ok.

Cassady37 · 12-16-2003, 04:32 PM

Now..insert \"Brooks\" where Cassady37 is and you\'ll see what I say is true!

12-16-2003, 09:49 AM	#11
BillyC Banned Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 842	Shootin' down another arguement.......(WhoDat) Billy, I gotta ask...what do you do all day? Please don\'t take any offense by this, but I\'m just wondering, considering the amount of times you post and all the time you take to research these stats. I have an office equipement company. B&G is just my side job. It would be hard for me to be a Louisiana congressman, considering I live in Mississippi. But, y\'all can send in contributions it ya want.......... :P
BillyC Banned Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 842

12-16-2003, 02:42 PM	#12
seraph33 Registered Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Baton Rouge Posts: 68	Shootin' down another arguement.......(WhoDat) Wow Billy C I love how you always post up QB ratings to compare AB to the elite of the NFL. Too bad FUMBLES don\'t factor into QB ratings. That would give AB alot more than 8 turnovers this year. Also Billy, I loved your falsifing some of the statistics on Delhomme last week. I know you said you just got them off of another post but still one has to wonder.

12-16-2003, 02:46 PM	#13
seraph33 Registered Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Baton Rouge Posts: 68	Shootin' down another arguement.......(WhoDat) All in fun Gator. I don\'t take this stuff that seriously anymore. People have their opinions. More power to \'em. I\'m just playin\' around with WhoDat. If folks wanna gang up on me.........then it\'s ok. that is untill AB has another horrible game. You are such a contradiction. You\'re like the kid in middle school who picks on everyone else then when people pick back you go off to tell the teacher. Just can\'t take your own medicine.

12-16-2003, 02:48 PM	#14
BillyC Banned Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 842	Shootin' down another arguement.......(WhoDat) Wow Billy C I love how you always post up QB ratings to compare AB to the elite of the NFL. Too bad FUMBLES don\'t factor into QB ratings. That would give AB alot more than 8 turnovers this year. Also Billy, I loved your falsifing some of the statistics on Delhomme last week. I know you said you just got them off of another post but still one has to wonder. I love how you go after me. I\'m not the one who said Brooks needed to be in the top 5 in quarterback rankings. I also provided a link to the Jake Delhomme stats. I don\'t make things up. I\'m guilty of not verifing the stats, but that\'s about it. If you have a problem with the way QB\'s are ranked, you should talk to the NFL about that, not me. I don\'t make the criteria up. [Edited on 16/12/2003 by JOESAM2002]
BillyC Banned Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 842

12-16-2003, 03:08 PM	#15
seraph33 Registered Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Baton Rouge Posts: 68	Shootin' down another arguement.......(WhoDat) you chose criteria that doesn\'t tell the whole story. You post the stats, print up the \"8\" ints in bold to prove your point but completely leave out the # of fumbles. And the only reason I\'m \"going after you\" is b/c of how you present yourself on this board. AB has a few weeks of bad games and you\'re saying that you are taking a break from the board, everyone is out to get me. AB has ONE monster game and you are back everyone who thought differently than you. If you wouldn\'t present yourself as such , people would actually listen to what you have to say and respect your opinions even if it differed from their own. Then we could actually have a good debate with you, but whenever someone (at least when I do this) brings up counter points to your statements, YOU rarely bring any substantial counters. Most of the time on . Then, of course, anytime , you were just \"joking around\". Yeah that line is getting old. Billy C. I personally like the fact that the board doesn\'t agree. I actually like the fact that you tend to have the polar opposite opinion to my own. It gives everyone something to debate about. Still the way you come off , annoys the hell out of me. [Edited on 16/12/2003 by seraph33] No need for personal attacking. [Edited on 16/12/2003 by JOESAM2002]

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

12-16-2003, 03:17 PM	#16
BillyC Banned Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 842	Shootin' down another arguement.......(WhoDat) seraph33 -- Again, you go after me and bring nothing substantive to what the topic is about. Which is, AB is ranked # 6 in the NFL. I\'ll not be sucked into personal attacks or anything that will remotely resemble that. Who cares what you think of me or anyone else. I can send you my personal e-mail or better yet my address, if you would like to tell me in person what you think of me? I\'ll continue to post You seem to be confused and think my post was about Brooks fumbling the ball. It wasn\'t!! It was about Brooks improvement in the passing game. It was about Brooks being ranked where so many have said he needed to be. Been there. Done that. [Edited on 16/12/2003 by JOESAM2002]
BillyC Banned Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 842

12-16-2003, 03:47 PM	#17
BillyC Banned Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 842	Shootin' down another arguement.......(WhoDat) Joe, I saw you edited my posts. I think I kept them very clean. I don\'t mind that you edited the way you saw fit though. I\'m really trying. You have actually gotten very good at editing the posts and making them still make sense. Sometimes too good at it --
BillyC Banned Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 842

12-16-2003, 04:10 PM	#18
Cassady37 100th Post Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Kilgore, Texas Posts: 337	Shootin' down another arguement.......(WhoDat) Haven\'t any of you figured it out yet??!!! BillyC is really Haslett! Look at all his stats and arguments over the coarse of this board. Who does he defend the most?? Why does it seem like he\'s obsessive?? It\'s because he is really Haslett! Only Haslett would have this much time on his hands, check our team\'s record, he\'s not spending that much time coaching. Back away Haslett, go to the chaclkboard...let\'s try to make the playoffs...do some coaching....

12-16-2003, 04:14 PM	#19
BillyC Banned Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 842	Shootin' down another arguement.......(WhoDat) It\'s ok Cassady37. You will be ok.
BillyC Banned Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 842

12-16-2003, 04:32 PM	#20
Cassady37 100th Post Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Kilgore, Texas Posts: 337	Shootin' down another arguement.......(WhoDat) Now..insert \"Brooks\" where Cassady37 is and you\'ll see what I say is true!