|
|||||||
Defensive shakeup
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; I've always been in favor of the 4-3 as opposed to the 3-4 as the base for a D, but I wouldn't be against it if it made the D better. But, alas, it's hard to see how things would ...
6Likes |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-01-2011, 03:41 PM
|
#11 |
|
Site Donor 2015
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Finland... formerly Southern Virginia
Posts: 4,961
|
I've always been in favor of the 4-3 as opposed to the 3-4 as the base for a D, but I wouldn't be against it if it made the D better. But, alas, it's hard to see how things would improve with the LBs the Saints have at the moment, and I'm not sure how well GW is adapted to working out of that base... does anyone know if he has ever had a 3-4 as the base of his D?
Anyway, if they were to run the 3-4 I'd like to see Franklin as the nose, because that is where he shined in SF. |
|
"I'm not bashing people, I'm bashing their opinions because in my opinion their opinion is wrong" - Danno
|
|
|
|
11-01-2011, 03:48 PM
|
#12 |
|
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alexandria, La
Posts: 11,303
|
Myself; I'm a fan of the 3-4... i think it's a lot easier to disguise blitzes and bring pressure from a lot more angles. However at this time our LBs are too small to run it consistently.
|
|
|
|
11-01-2011, 04:02 PM
|
#13 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: "Little Ole Town in Tejas"
Posts: 7,586
|
Originally Posted by |Mitch|
Me to Mitch...if you notice the 3-4 gives us the most trouble..and the teams that run it are always the best Ds in the league. |
|
|
|
11-01-2011, 04:12 PM
|
#14 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: "Little Ole Town in Tejas"
Posts: 7,586
|
Originally Posted by |Mitch|
Ok Mitch i got it..lol Wilson -OLB 250 Vilma-MLB 230 Shanle MLB 245 Galette-OLB 253 That's 3-4 size... |
|
|
|
11-01-2011, 05:40 PM
|
#15 |
|
Site Donor 2018
|
Regarding the tackles, Franklin and Rogers rotate at the nose as they're the same position and big guys like that have a snap-count ceiling...
Johnson and Ellis are at the Three-tech; Ellis second on the depth chart to send a msg... Rotate the DE's more so their fresh and can keep coming all game through with the best rushers game by game basis going in the fourth quarter... Linebackers? Vilma/Humber (Mike-backer), Shanle/Casillas (Will-backer), Dunbar/Wilson (Sam-backer); they need work, lotsa work... |
|
|
|
11-01-2011, 05:55 PM
|
#16 |
|
Truth Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,715
|
Originally Posted by jeanpierre
Yep, nothing wrong with a 4-3.
Its not the alignment that matters, its the alignees. Our current players are better suited using a base 4-3. While Jordan, Franklin, and Wilson are decent 3-4 prospects, Smith is strictly a 4-3 DE. Vilma is strictly a 4-3 MLB (or a 4-3 WLB), Dunbar is ideally a 4-3 MLB, and Shanle can't play ILB in a 3-4. They'd all get eaten alive by O-linemen. I'm not sure Galette would be a good stand-up DE/OLB either. He looks like a 4-3 RDE all day long. Johnson and Ellis are in no way shape or form 3-4 DT's. |
|
|
|
11-01-2011, 07:01 PM
|
#17 |
|
Hou Saints Fan
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 5,050
|
I don't think the scheme is the problem, its more execution .... it would help if the corners would catch INTs that hit them right in the hands
|
|
|
|
11-01-2011, 07:35 PM
|
#18 |
|
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Grand Haven, Michigan by way of a little Mississippi River town in Louisiana
Posts: 5,893
|
I'd move Vilma to WLB, Wilson to the middle he's heavier than Vilma. I really like Vilma but for some reason he seems a half step slower to the ball, he could easily cover ground from that position. Wilson is fast but not as seasoned which could may make up in speed for inexperience.
|
|
|
|
11-01-2011, 08:12 PM
|
#19 |
|
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alexandria, La
Posts: 11,303
|
Originally Posted by strato
Actually 3-4 LB's are usually 4-3 tweeners; 4-3 Defensive ends that are really too small to play the position effectively... I would say 250-260+
|
|
|
|
11-01-2011, 09:10 PM
|
#20 |
|
10000 POST CLUB
|
Rogers. Underachiever before he came here. Still one.
Franklin. What has he done? Ellis. IMO, he's suffering from playing next to Rogers Jordan. Rookie Tom Johnson. Raw. Gallette. Undersized. Not a polished rusher. Charleston. Career backup. Smith. Best we've got? Dunbar. Physical, doesn't play smart. Casillas. Work in progress. Shanle. Shanle. Vilma. Commander in chief. But can't rely on his cabinet. Challenge me if you like, but I don't believe this is a unit that plays well together. |
|
|
Linear Mode
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/37738-defensive-shakeup.html
|
||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
| Defensive shakeup | This thread | Refback | 11-01-2011 03:04 PM | 8 |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:10 PM.
