Does anyone think if Ingram had played, the outcome would have been different?

jnormand · 11-01-2011, 06:56 PM

I think it would have made a difference but I'm not sure it would have turned the game.

|Mitch| · 11-01-2011, 08:23 PM

Originally Posted by strato

I read where Carmichael called the first half and Payton the second?..geez here i am again posting about that dam game..lol..must back away....

So does that mean running in the 4th quarter was Sean's fault?

Mardigras9 · 11-01-2011, 08:33 PM

NOPE, woudln't have mattered who was in there.

saintsfan1976 · 11-01-2011, 09:00 PM

Told ya - "I bet Carmichael called the game"

jcp026 · 11-01-2011, 09:13 PM

It wouldn't have made a difference...unless it made the team more determined and changed the way we called offensive plays.

saintsfan1976 · 11-01-2011, 09:14 PM

Not unless he coached.

Ashley · 11-02-2011, 12:13 AM

no

Marlboro Man · 11-02-2011, 08:14 PM

Absolutely not.

JoanieNTX · 11-03-2011, 03:28 PM

I say yes. I think Ingram is a workhorse, and we needed that during that stupid game. We needed to rotate some finesse running and some "in your face" running. And, of course, it would have helped if Jackson were not on 'roids.

CharityMike · 11-03-2011, 03:46 PM

Originally Posted by JoanieNTX

I say yes. I think Ingram is a workhorse, and we needed that during that stupid game. We needed to rotate some finesse running and some "in your face" running. And, of course, it would have helped if Jackson were not on 'roids.

Chris Ivory could have filled that role. They were to scared he would hurt himself again. It was a failure from the top down. We need to win any way possible and they blew it by not using our top pounder. You can't expect much when the guy runs 1 time and goes to the sideline.

11-01-2011, 08:23 PM	#22
\|Mitch\| 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Alexandria, La Posts: 11,303	Originally Posted by strato I read where Carmichael called the first half and Payton the second?..geez here i am again posting about that dam game..lol..must back away.... So does that mean running in the 4th quarter was Sean's fault?

11-01-2011, 09:13 PM	#25
jcp026 500th Post Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 951	It wouldn't have made a difference...unless it made the team more determined and changed the way we called offensive plays.
jcp026 500th Post Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 951

11-03-2011, 03:46 PM	#30
CharityMike Site Donor 2018 Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Mid City, New Orleans Posts: 3,556	Originally Posted by JoanieNTX I say yes. I think Ingram is a workhorse, and we needed that during that stupid game. We needed to rotate some finesse running and some "in your face" running. And, of course, it would have helped if Jackson were not on 'roids. Chris Ivory could have filled that role. They were to scared he would hurt himself again. It was a failure from the top down. We need to win any way possible and they blew it by not using our top pounder. You can't expect much when the guy runs 1 time and goes to the sideline.

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/37743-does-anyone-think-if-ingram-had-played-outcome-would-have-been-different.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
Does anyone think if Ingram had played, the outcome would have been different?	This thread	Refback	11-01-2011 06:18 PM	2

11-01-2011, 06:56 PM	#21
jnormand 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: The Free State of Idaho Posts: 5,662	I think it would have made a difference but I'm not sure it would have turned the game.

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

11-01-2011, 08:33 PM	#23
Mardigras9 Site Donor 2015 Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Land Mass between LA and AL Posts: 4,375	NOPE, woudln't have mattered who was in there.

11-01-2011, 09:00 PM	#24
saintsfan1976 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Atlanta Posts: 10,832 Blog Entries: 3	Told ya - "I bet Carmichael called the game"

11-01-2011, 09:14 PM	#26
saintsfan1976 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Atlanta Posts: 10,832 Blog Entries: 3	Not unless he coached.

11-02-2011, 12:13 AM	#27
Ashley Site Donor Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Colorado Springs Co Posts: 2,760	no

11-02-2011, 08:14 PM	#28
Marlboro Man 1000 Posts + Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 1,469	Absolutely not.

11-03-2011, 03:28 PM	#29
JoanieNTX 500th Post Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Conroe, TX Posts: 825	I say yes. I think Ingram is a workhorse, and we needed that during that stupid game. We needed to rotate some finesse running and some "in your face" running. And, of course, it would have helped if Jackson were not on 'roids.