|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; If you were the ref that reversed the call, how could you explain to me that the hold on Abe was not a safety? According to what the ref determined, it was a screen play and therefore not a safety....
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-27-2011, 12:46 AM | #1 |
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 31
|
The hold in the endzone... was it a safety?
If you were the ref that reversed the call, how could you explain to me that the hold on Abe was not a safety?
According to what the ref determined, it was a screen play and therefore not a safety. |
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
12-27-2011, 12:51 AM | #3 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,417
|
I don't think I've ever seen that before. I'm glad it went in our favor, but I'm confused about why it was reversed. Maybe someone who knows the rules better than me can explain it.
|
12-27-2011, 12:53 AM | #4 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Shreveport,Louisiana
Posts: 16,046
|
Ask Mike Peirira?
|
12-27-2011, 01:00 AM | #5 |
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 31
|
Yea, I'm not one to harp on refs "assisting" a team, but that call was a flagrant as you can get. I understand a few homeristic calls from time to time, but it clearly wasn't the Falcons day to walk into the dome. I could point to 3 other penalties that really could have been called differently, but the most intriguing was the safety call.
|
12-27-2011, 09:17 AM | #7 |
E. Side Cholo
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Barrio, H-town
Posts: 6,089
|
homertastic
|
12-27-2011, 09:31 AM | #8 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 11,208
|
The refs explained it as the RB was trying to get loose, so maybe they are meaning that abraham stopped the RB, and they all got hit together and fell to the ground lol
|