Looks like the Saints are No.6 in rushing

|Mitch| · 01-02-2012, 12:29 PM

Every time I look at our run stats, I can't help but to think about Caddieman and his argument earlier in the season about the Falcons run game being superior... what now?!

Danno · 01-02-2012, 12:34 PM

Originally Posted by |Mitch|

Every time I look at our run stats, I can't help but to think about Caddieman and his argument earlier in the season about the Falcons run game being superior... what now?!

I'm surprised at the improvement once we got De La Puente and Strief returned and played a few games together.

Kreutz, Brown and Stinch were simply not very good.

To Caddie's credit, the Falcons were better early in the season, but a lot can change over 16 games.

01-02-2012, 12:34 PM	#2
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,758	Originally Posted by \|Mitch\| Every time I look at our run stats, I can't help but to think about Caddieman and his argument earlier in the season about the Falcons run game being superior... what now?! I'm surprised at the improvement once we got De La Puente and Strief returned and played a few games together. Kreutz, Brown and Stinch were simply not very good. To Caddie's credit, the Falcons were better early in the season, but a lot can change over 16 games.

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/39711-looks-like-saints-no-6-rushing.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
Looks like the Saints are No.6 in rushing	This thread	Refback	01-02-2012 12:36 PM	2

01-02-2012, 12:29 PM	#1
\|Mitch\| 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Alexandria, La Posts: 11,303	Every time I look at our run stats, I can't help but to think about Caddieman and his argument earlier in the season about the Falcons run game being superior... what now?!