FinSaint

It's true that NYG started a bad spell of games with the loss to SF on week 10, but they weren't that impressive even before that. W1 they lost to the Redskins; W4 they almost lost to ARI with a scoreline of 31-27; W5 they lost to SEA 36-25; W6 they almost lost to BUF with a scoreline of 27-24; W8 they narrowly edged in front of a struggling MIA team 20-17; W9 they won gainst NE 24-20; and then W10 SF demolished them 27-20 (while Bradshaw was injured).

After that they went on their losing streak: W11 losing to PHI 17-10; W12 losing to NO 49-24 (while still missing Bradshaw); W13 losing to GB 38-35; W14 winning against DAL; W15 losing again to WAS.

Then they seemed to get their act together (mainly fueled by their defense) winning against NYJ and DAL to end the season, but my point is that NYG was not a good team this regular season, so to claim that winning against them was somehow a mark of a good team... then the Redskins must've been absolutely amazing since they won against them twice.

And, by the way, they only lost 4 games after the SF game not 5 as you claimed. It would be 5 only if you counted the SF loss to that "skid" that they went on after the loss to SF, but that would be illogical.

"I'm not bashing people, I'm bashing their opinions because in my opinion their opinion is wrong" - Danno