the steelers?really?

|Mitch| · 01-08-2012, 05:32 PM

I think Ben is in about the same condition he was in for the SF game; wasn't that the game or two after his initial injury?

Either way; Charlie Batch would have been a better option in the SF game; Ben's ankle is a severe liability...

Tobias-Reiper · 01-08-2012, 06:29 PM

Originally Posted by |Mitch|

I think Ben is in about the same condition he was in for the SF game.

Oh, no. in that SF game, he could not move. He took the snap, limped 3-4 steps back, and stood there. That was right down irresponsible of Tomlin not only to let him play in that condition, but to basically cripple his own offense like that.

01-08-2012, 06:29 PM	#2
Tobias-Reiper Merces Letifer Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 4,161	Originally Posted by \|Mitch\| I think Ben is in about the same condition he was in for the SF game. Oh, no. in that SF game, he could not move. He took the snap, limped 3-4 steps back, and stood there. That was right down irresponsible of Tomlin not only to let him play in that condition, but to basically cripple his own offense like that.

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/40063-steelers-really.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
the steelers?really?	This thread	Refback	01-08-2012 05:50 PM	1

01-08-2012, 05:32 PM	#1
\|Mitch\| 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Alexandria, La Posts: 11,303	I think Ben is in about the same condition he was in for the SF game; wasn't that the game or two after his initial injury? Either way; Charlie Batch would have been a better option in the SF game; Ben's ankle is a severe liability...