![]() |
I wouldn't use the Steelers as a main example. Their offensive line has been bad, running game has been non-existent, no tight end production, Ben's been banged up, and their receiving core has been hit or miss.
So... it's not like that's a big accomplishment. |
Quote:
|
Yeah I mean the other stats are certainly legit, but as for holding the Steelers to 3 points well I watched that game, pretty closely knowing that we might end up playing Frisco, and I could clearly tell that Rothlisberger was just "not right" and totally off his game. There were plenty of plays/opportunities where a normal Ben or even last night's Ben would have had no difficulty making a throw or running the ball or doing whatever, but he couldn't do any of it, he was too gimpy and hobbled. It was kinda painful to watch. I mean it certainly made it easier for their defense to do that.
|
Quote:
Beating the steelers is a huge accomplishment Alright then...how about shutting the rams out? We couldn't even manage beating them |
I started by saying that SF was the best D we have faced this year. No one is arguing with you, except for your ridiculously hyperbolic statement about Cushing, Joseph and the number 4 D being little girls
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Was he too hurt or was he shredding their D? To me that's an excuse Injuries happen and you can blame the game on injuries or you could admit that the steelers are a defensive team and their injured QB had less impact on the outcome of the game than ppl think I can't defend the 49ers weak schedule but we all know how yardage gets accumulated in garbage time and we all know points are more important than yards I don't care if we give up 211 yards to Calvin Johnson because I know we can stop them just enough for our offense to do its job The 49ers are the same way. Except they are very good at getting sacks and turnovers |
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:03 AM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com