GOING ONE DIMENSIONAL

dizzle88 · 01-15-2012, 04:08 AM

Offensive turnovers hurt, but the 9ers didnt do any damage from them. The only thing it did was stop us from scoring

D played good for 3 quarters and for rested for a long time in the 4th, they came out and lost us the game.

I'd solely blame GW for his play calling on the last drive, he has played prevent all the time at the end of the games and it's finished them nicely, so why rush 7 and leave Jenkins in a one on one with Davis who had owned him all game.
Not impressed with Jenkins or many of our d backs tbh, only players that I saw give 110% were colston and Harper.
Harper gave up a pass play, but 2 sacks and a bunch of tackles, defensive scheme we play only comes through when we are leading by 14 or more, new DC please

G504 · 01-15-2012, 04:17 AM

Originally Posted by dizzle88

Offensive turnovers hurt, but the 9ers didnt do any damage from them. The only thing it did was stop us from scoring

Yeah, but that was enough. Holding us to 1 or no scores in a quarter is a HUGE victory for the other team, especially if the game is close. We basically handed them 13 points off of turnovers. But still, 1:32 from victory, and we couldn't hold Alex Smith in check that long? Something's definitely wrong.

UK_WhoDat · 01-15-2012, 04:49 AM

Originally Posted by G504

Yeah, but that was enough. ......

Yep, it could well be true. We looked 99% certain to score 3 or more points on the PT fumble. And then the clock runs further.

ANd okay dizzle refers specifically to Offensive errors, but the kickoff/punt return errors were absolutely game determining.

01-15-2012, 04:08 AM	#1
dizzle88 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 11,518	Offensive turnovers hurt, but the 9ers didnt do any damage from them. The only thing it did was stop us from scoring D played good for 3 quarters and for rested for a long time in the 4th, they came out and lost us the game. I'd solely blame GW for his play calling on the last drive, he has played prevent all the time at the end of the games and it's finished them nicely, so why rush 7 and leave Jenkins in a one on one with Davis who had owned him all game. Not impressed with Jenkins or many of our d backs tbh, only players that I saw give 110% were colston and Harper. Harper gave up a pass play, but 2 sacks and a bunch of tackles, defensive scheme we play only comes through when we are leading by 14 or more, new DC please
	Your bonehead creator picked a fine chapter to omit from your memory bank....let me ask you, does a machine like yourself ever experience fear? - Vegeta, DBZ

01-15-2012, 04:17 AM	#2
G504 100th Post Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Miami Posts: 424	Originally Posted by dizzle88 Offensive turnovers hurt, but the 9ers didnt do any damage from them. The only thing it did was stop us from scoring Yeah, but that was enough. Holding us to 1 or no scores in a quarter is a HUGE victory for the other team, especially if the game is close. We basically handed them 13 points off of turnovers. But still, 1:32 from victory, and we couldn't hold Alex Smith in check that long? Something's definitely wrong. UK_WhoDat likes this.

01-15-2012, 04:49 AM	#3
UK_WhoDat 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Wherever I lay my hat Posts: 4,000	Originally Posted by G504 Yeah, but that was enough. ...... Yep, it could well be true. We looked 99% certain to score 3 or more points on the PT fumble. And then the clock runs further. ANd okay dizzle refers specifically to Offensive errors, but the kickoff/punt return errors were absolutely game determining.