|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Hall was originally picked up by the Saints from GB because of his special teams excellence not for his full-back play, but it was only logical to think he would also play that position rather than having two FBs on ...
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#7 |
Site Donor 2015
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Finland... formerly Southern Virginia
Posts: 4,963
|
Hall was originally picked up by the Saints from GB because of his special teams excellence not for his full-back play, but it was only logical to think he would also play that position rather than having two FBs on the roster, and he would have if not for Collins.
Also, the speculation in regards to PT's future is unnecessary because he signed his latest contract last year and will only be entering the second year of that contract, which would make trading him problematic. On top of it all, he is relatively cheap for what he brings to the table and it would be stupid to get rid off someone like that - PT will be making about $2.5M/year through his contract with undisclosed escalators. The article itself had some daring predictions... everyone returns for at least another season. |
"I'm not bashing people, I'm bashing their opinions because in my opinion their opinion is wrong" - Danno
|
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/41095-saints-who-could-stay-who-could-go-quarterbacks-running-backs-tight-ends.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
Saints: Who could stay and who could go - Quarterbacks, Running Backs and Tight Ends | This thread | Refback | 02-09-2012 01:55 PM | 2 |