|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; I don't know but we're about to break it! Alaska...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#2 |
E. Side Cholo
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Barrio, H-town
Posts: 6,089
|
It didnt curse the '79 Rams. Super Bowl was in Pasadena, suburb of L.A.
they lost to the Steelers. The '87 ? 49ers ?? played in Palo Alto (fairly close to SF) beat the Dolphins.... thats all I can think of. Pittsburgh, Minn, Buffalo, Denver, and Dallas account for about 19 of the first super bowls, and they never hosted it... so maybe thats part of it. Plus WE hosted --- what about 8 or 9? and we've historically sucked, so thats much of it. The only SB caliber teams I can remember the 1st 20 years that played in host cities were Miami and the L.A. Raiders... and they just happen to go the years they hosted. I remember Houston hosted once in '74 ? and the Oilers didnt have a chance. Not even astronomically. |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Part Time Pimp
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,967
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Site Donor
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Colorado Springs Co
Posts: 2,760
|
Hell no we got this!
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/41185-hosting-super-bowl-curse.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
Is hosting the Super Bowl a curse? | This thread | Refback | 02-13-2012 05:10 AM | 2 |