Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

Saints slogan for 2012

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; How about "no more slogans"...

Like Tree9Likes

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-26-2012, 09:49 AM   #1
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,747
How about "no more slogans"
Saint_LB and The Dude like this.
Danno is offline  
Old 02-26-2012, 10:20 AM   #2
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 11,518
I need to change my most used slogan, for the last two years it been "can't we catch a damn interception!"
dizzle88 is offline  
Old 02-26-2012, 11:23 AM   #3
Site Donor
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Black Pearl University
Posts: 799
How about:
"We can't get a deal done to save our lives, so look forward to a .500 season after losing half of our godd*** team"
alexonfyre is offline  
Old 02-26-2012, 11:51 AM   #4
Site Donor 2015
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Finland... formerly Southern Virginia
Posts: 4,963
Originally Posted by alexonfyre View Post
How about:
"We can't get a deal done to save our lives, so look forward to a .500 season after losing half of our godd*** team"

Overreact much?!
SloMotion likes this.
FinSaint is offline  
Old 02-26-2012, 12:24 PM   #5
Site Donor
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Black Pearl University
Posts: 799
Originally Posted by FinSaint View Post
Overreact much?!
Sorry, but if Drew were the only important player that needed a deal I would say take however long you want, but we have 3 or 4 other guys that we really don't need to lose, and it looks like we won't have half of them come preseason.
alexonfyre is offline  
Old 02-26-2012, 12:50 PM   #6
Truth Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,747
Originally Posted by alexonfyre View Post
Sorry, but if Drew were the only important player that needed a deal I would say take however long you want, but we have 3 or 4 other guys that we really don't need to lose, and it looks like we won't have half of them come preseason.
Why do you think they won't be resigned?
Danno is offline  
Old 02-26-2012, 12:51 PM   #7
5000 POSTS! +
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,776
Blog Entries: 15
Originally Posted by alexonfyre View Post
Sorry, but if Drew were the only important player that needed a deal I would say take however long you want, but we have 3 or 4 other guys that we really don't need to lose, and it looks like we won't have half of them come preseason.
I enjoyed the candor and pessimism in your original comment, , and you're right, the F/O has a lot to do, but it's still early in the contract season and no sense worrying about stuff that's out of your control ... like the draft & free agency. They'll get it done, it's all just posturing for the moment, the NFL is a business.
FinSaint likes this.
SloMotion is offline  
Old 02-27-2012, 08:01 AM   #8
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: new jersey
Posts: 1,070
Originally Posted by SloMotion View Post
no sense worrying about stuff that's out of your control ... like the draft & free agency.
or play calling or injuries or wins and losses or NFL records...THE WHOLE NFL IS OUT OF OUR CONTROL...the only thing we control is our purchasing power to buy jerseys and tickets to games...and the remote control for the TV
mikesaintfan is offline  
Old 02-26-2012, 01:13 PM   #9
Site Donor 2015
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Finland... formerly Southern Virginia
Posts: 4,963
Originally Posted by alexonfyre View Post
Sorry, but if Drew were the only important player that needed a deal I would say take however long you want, but we have 3 or 4 other guys that we really don't need to lose, and it looks like we won't have half of them come preseason.

There's so much time left before the FA period begins that it is just too early to make such predictions.

With Loomis' track-record of keeping guys around that they want to keep, and his abilities in drawing up contracts that are as cap friendly as possible under given circumstances - I'm not worried about the fact that nothing concrete has surfaced yet.

There'll probably be many contract announcements during the week leading to the FA period, and honestly, there's no reason for the FO to get any of the contracts done before that - even Brees'.
Danno likes this.
FinSaint is offline  
Old 02-26-2012, 06:54 PM   #10
Site Donor
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Black Pearl University
Posts: 799
Originally Posted by FinSaint View Post
There's so much time left before the FA period begins that it is just too early to make such predictions.

With Loomis' track-record of keeping guys around that they want to keep, and his abilities in drawing up contracts that are as cap friendly as possible under given circumstances - I'm not worried about the fact that nothing concrete has surfaced yet.

There'll probably be many contract announcements during the week leading to the FA period, and honestly, there's no reason for the FO to get any of the contracts done before that - even Brees'.
Brees definitely has to come first, I agree with that. And they will probably sign Colston and tag Nicks. The problem is that next year Nicks will walk, since he already announced as much, if he gets tagged. It is the guys after that I am worried about. Meachem is much more valuable than most fans give him credit for, and Aubrayo Franklin needs to stick around so that Spags has more than one person who fits his scheme. If a deal isn't done some time early this week, frankly, we have no chance at keeping either of them, which would leave us in a pretty awkward position in FA and the draft. We would pretty much have to go back to picking up a WR and an extra DT instead of a cover safety and linebackers like we so desperately need. It totally bones the entire road map set up by the last couple years.
alexonfyre is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:37 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts