![]() |
Article calls NFL findings BS. Read how.
This article breaks down the Saints 2009-2011 seasons and explains what the NFL report doesn't.
Proving the Saints innocence. The Bounty Investigation: Saints' Bounties Produced Little Booty - WSJ.com |
just shows our players werent capable. NFL doesnt like that a bounty program was "in place"
|
I think I'm going to turn to the Wall St Journal for my sports news more often.
Another article on WSJ says that the NFL was reviewing 50,000 pages of documentation for possible evidence. Not that there was a 50,000 page report on the Saints, as ESPN had reported. NFL Plays Defense on Suits - WSJ.com |
The Wall Street Journal is actually REALLY good for sports, especially stuff like this.
|
Great article, people are starting to apply the proper perspective. Honestly, I've found more legitimate football news sources just by hanging around this board. Everybody who contributes on here should be commended.
|
Yep......sure is. There's sunshine behind those clouds.:smile:
|
I just hope the man in the glass slipper reads this. Roger
|
What everyone is forgetting is that it doesn't matter if Saints players make .50 or $50K.
The problem is the INTENT was to injure another player to receive money. |
Quote:
More and more, I think they're going to work the "non-contractual bonus payments" angle ... sort of how when they couldn't get anything concrete on Al Capone, they went after him for income tax evasion. |
Quote:
|
I have yet to see any evidence that can be proven that they all had a collective intent to injure opposing players.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:51 AM. |
Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com