03-07-2012, 02:01 PM
|
#2
|
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 7,601
|
Originally Posted by xan
There's no dispute on the fund itself, just the conditions of payout. It would be dishonest to label the pool an "injury bounty pool" if that were, in fact NOT a condition of participation. So far, no evidence has been presented on the injury side, just the "play of the game" side.
Just because some pundit makes an inference based on NO INFORMATION OR FACT, simply because the term "bounty" has been used, doesn't make the situation illegal or immoral.
LOL XAN, you are taking the denial approach still?
Yes there is evidence they have e-mails even of details about it and documents. As well as players and coaches accepting the blame for it. It indeed happened, my friend.
The only question anyone really has is who accepted money's for someone getting hurt. I don't think there was anyone who collected a reward for that. I mean there was no principal player hurt / I should clarify, 'taken out of a game' or by cart. Except for Warner who left the game but returned.
Also the fact that no one is denying that Vilma went into the locker room with 10K to take out Farve. Just that alone is a violation of the rule.
|
E U P H O R I A
|
|
|