|
|||||||
Are we set at safety?
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Our strong safety is dynamite in the box and gets beat by big boys in coverage, but he is getting better each year. We could expect to lose him for a game or two because of his aggressive demolishing hits.....it's ...
20Likes|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-03-2012, 10:17 PM
|
#1 |
|
Bounty Money $$$
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 5800 Airline Dr. Metairie, LA.
Posts: 24,117
|
Are we set at safety?
Our strong safety is dynamite in the box and gets beat by big boys in coverage, but he is getting better each year.
We could expect to lose him for a game or two because of his aggressive demolishing hits.....it's a possibility I think. Our free safety takes bad angles, doesn't tackle well and is always just a little too late. He missed Sharper more than anybody. He was a slow corner we converted. I don't want to call it a failed experiment but when Sharper was here Jenkins played better. I may get a few folks that won't agree.jmho How set are we at the safety positions and depth? |
 There Are Two Kinds Of People In This World Being A Rugby Player Is Better Than Both Of Them
Last edited by Rugby Saint II; 04-03-2012 at 10:19 PM.. |
|
|
Threaded Mode
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/42908-we-set-safety.html
|
||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
| Are we set at safety? | This thread | Refback | 04-03-2012 10:40 PM | 4 |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:15 PM.
