|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by x626xBlack Yes he did... Greg is now Goodells jack-in-the-box. He stays in the box untill RG turns his crank. My gut tells me Goodell is playing nice with the NFLPA for now. The NFLPA is going to ...
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-03-2012, 01:26 PM | #21 |
Rating:
(0 votes - average)
Originally Posted by x626xBlack
You might be right about GW. That makes sense. But the rest, as to GW knows something damning, doesn't follow Godells actions.
He would have memo'd Benson,SP,Vit,Vilma,Smith to shut up or it will get worse, and hasn't . Godell does not have anything, makes way more sense. A few pp slides,couple emails and GW is his only witness that anything occurred at all, is why he's in a box. |
|
Views: 3544
|
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
05-03-2012, 01:27 PM | #22 |
Donated Plasma
|
Originally Posted by x626xBlack
Maybe so. Maybe not. I think not actually. You really think Goodell is going to wait and suspend more players down the road based on evidence he says he has today? I seriously doubt that.
I think what evidence he has is crap, and I think he knows it. I think you're giving Goodell too much credit. He is manipulating this as best he can at every turn. If he had solid evidence he wouldn't have to. |
05-03-2012, 02:32 PM | #23 |
100th Post
|
I completely agree with you. I pulled this from the NFLPA contract from 2006:
Article VIII Club Discipline-Conduct detrimental to club: Conduct detrimental to Club—maximum fine of an amount equal to one week’s salary and/or suspension without pay for a period not to exceed four (4) weeks. This maximum applies without limitation to any deactivation of a player in response to player conduct (other than a deactivation in response to a player’s on-field playing ability), and any such deactivation, even with pay, shall be considered discipline subject to the limits set forth in this section. Article XI Commissioner discipline-Section 1 league discipline: Article (a) subsection (b) action taken against a player by the Commissioner for conduct detrimental to the integrity of, or public confidence in, the game of professional football, will be processed exclusively as follows: the Commissioner will promptly send written notice of his action to the player, with a copy to the NFLPA. Within twenty (20) days following such written notification, the player affected thereby, or the NFLPA with the player’s approval, may appeal in writing to the Commissioner. |
05-03-2012, 03:00 PM | #24 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cypress Tx.
Posts: 19,026
|
Originally Posted by pherein
While Goodell may be an idiot, you may want to consider that a multi-billion dollar corporation has teams of lawyers and strategists. Any strategist worth $5 knows you NEVER tip your entire hand, until its time to rake the pot.
Actually it makes perfect sense. Ill role play Goodell, why would I send a memo? To chance someone leaking it to the press. Also, they did shut up. What have you heard from Benson, SP, Vit since they were handed their punishment? Nada When it comes to multi-billion dollar corporations NOTHING is ever as transparent as it seems. You also hold everything tight to chest, if the NFLPA wants to see what Goodell has they will have to sue and go to discovery and that will get expensive. Also, at the end of the day Goodell does not want everything to go public (unless it absolutely HAS TO), even if it is all negative against the players. Remember, anything incriminating on the players is a black eye for the entire league. If a warehouse full of email incriminating 300 players in the NFL were to surface, that would damage a lot more than just Goodells integrity or a players integrity, it would damage the game. Fan bases would be lost, people who believe that the NFL is just a bunch of grown men playing fun football would be soured to the NFL... And trust me, read the comments on nfl.com there are masses of fans that believe their team/player is above that.
Originally Posted by saintfan
I am not giving Goodell any credit. I am giving a team of lawyers that check each and every move he makes credit.
Everything said, it was the NFLPA that empowered him in the CBA. Not the owners, the frikken Union. A Union that is now being second guessed because the preception is that it is trying to protect 4 rogue players and not the rest of the league. Look at professional football as an organized religion. Just one piece of proof that what is being believed is wrong and the religion crumbles. Faith is lost. They go somewhere else. |
It's not what you look at that matters, it's what you see. ~ Henry David Thoreau
|
|
05-03-2012, 03:11 PM | #25 |
Donated Plasma
|
Originally Posted by x626xBlack
I don't think the NFLPA is being perceived that way at all. I think ESPN is trying to tilt it in that direction, but I've seen just as many comments stating precisely what I believe which is the NFLPA is protecting players from Roger Goodell, and that's exactly what it should be doing. Even the players (with a couple bitter Vikings players - one an idiot kicker - notwithstanding) think the suspended got a raw deal.
|
05-03-2012, 03:15 PM | #26 |
100th Post
|
Originally Posted by x626xBlack
Along the lines of what you are saying, maybe Goodell dealt a harsh punishment to Vilma and not the rest of the guys involved because he knew Vilma could appeal it and have it reduced. This would make it look like Goodell tried to maximize the penalties handed out but was unable to uphold them because of contract loop holes.
|
05-03-2012, 04:51 PM | #27 |
I wondet if Goodell was bullied as a young pup?
| |
05-04-2012, 12:07 AM | #28 |
Site Donor
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Black Pearl University
Posts: 799
|
Originally Posted by joker-saint
Is the 2011 contract available for public view yet?
|
05-04-2012, 01:25 AM | #29 |
Site Donor 2018
|
Originally Posted by NOS2SB
Neaux, Congress does not need to be involved...
NFL Customers and the Owners will adjust the problem... Please geaux back to the regular schedule programming that doesn't include media influences that led to that conclusion... |
05-04-2012, 10:14 AM | #30 |
100th Post
|
alexonfyre- I am not sure. It took me a while to find the one from 2009. According to the latest news though, it looks like I was partially right. Goodell supposedly doesn't have the authority to dole out punishments for offenses that occured before August 4 2011. It would have to be the system arbitrator who makes the decision.
|
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/43660-smiths-turn-his-statement.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
Smith's Turn, His Statement | This thread | Refback | 05-03-2012 12:08 AM | 2 |