Register All Albums FAQ Community Experience
Go Back   New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com > Main > Saints

NFL’s outside lawyer calls evidence against Saints players “quite strong”

this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by Beastmode I would be at that point but not until the evidence is presentend and examined in a REAL court of law. I actually care about this more than the entire NFL season. If they are proven ...

Like Tree17Likes

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-03-2012, 11:19 PM   #1
Site Donor
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Black Pearl University
Posts: 799
Originally Posted by Beastmode View Post
I would be at that point but not until the evidence is presentend and examined in a REAL court of law. I actually care about this more than the entire NFL season. If they are proven guilty fine, but right now the NFL's methods are unfair and unjust and that is not a system anyone in this country should be judged by.
This. I want to see the players and coaches involved get their right of due process satisfied by the US legal system....

I don't know if I really understood this saying until now but: "Our legal system is one of the worst, but its the best one we've got."
alexonfyre is offline  
Old 05-04-2012, 08:10 AM   #2
Donated Plasma
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 18,556
Blog Entries: 5
Originally Posted by Beastmode View Post
I would be at that point but not until the evidence is presentend and examined in a REAL court of law. I actually care about this more than the entire NFL season. If they are proven guilty fine, but right now the NFL's methods are unfair and unjust and that is not a system anyone in this country should be judged by.
This is where I'm living too. If guilty based on evidence provided to the people in question, then do your time. But right now I'm not willing to just be happy it's behind us. Not even close.
saintfan is offline  
Old 05-03-2012, 06:06 PM   #3
10000 POST CLUB
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Shreveport,Louisiana
Posts: 16,086
Exclamation

Howdy Ho!!
Halo and saintfan like this.
WhoDat!656 is offline  
Old 05-03-2012, 06:17 PM   #4
1000 Posts +
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Fairbanks, AK
Posts: 4,407
Blog Entries: 1
I am CornFlorio!
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	images-1.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	10.9 KB
ID:	4699  
Halo likes this.
iceshack149 is offline  
Old 05-03-2012, 08:20 PM   #5
Bounty Money $$$
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 5800 Airline Dr. Metairie, LA.
Posts: 24,153
What is quite strong is the bad smell this has to it.
Rugby Saint II is offline  
Old 05-03-2012, 09:01 PM   #6
Site Donor 2018
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Thibodaux
Posts: 43,543
Blog Entries: 39
Facing your accusers is a right of due process...
jeanpierre is offline  
Old 05-03-2012, 09:03 PM   #7
100th Post
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 431
We're all just supposed to take some random lawyer's word for it? Seriously?

The blantant efforts to keep from showing the so called strong evidence is pretty telling.
onebyone is offline  
Old 05-04-2012, 08:06 AM   #8
100th Post
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Diamondhead, MS
Posts: 272
Blog Entries: 1
The more I think about this, the more I think that the NFL's trump card could be Greg Williams himself. What else could kick off Coach Williams 'pennance tour' like solidifying the NFL's case against the players?

One way or another it's going to come down to someone's personal account. I remember a SportsCaster (Adam Schefter?) saying that he saw this happen in person, but having someone like Williams point the finger could be the best evidence possible.
pinch is offline  
Old 05-04-2012, 08:25 AM   #9
failclownHunter
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: N.O. and V.A.
Posts: 2,260
Blog Entries: 3
Mary Jo Whites statements are usual for counsel, but oddly enough still provide no evidence. In fact why is she speaking up for Goodell's position at all at this time?
Seems and odd thing to do, unless your trying to prevent Vilma from civil/legal action.
I mean what is the purpose of it. He was obviously told her to make these statements.
And her statement come down to this " Oh, believe me and roger, they are guilt"

Her motive to me are much more interesting than anything she said, we have all heard this before.

Last edited by pherein; 05-04-2012 at 08:28 AM..
pherein is offline  
Old 05-04-2012, 08:38 AM   #10
Donated Plasma
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 18,556
Blog Entries: 5
Originally Posted by pherein View Post
Mary Jo Whites statements are usual for counsel, but oddly enough still provide no evidence. In fact why is she speaking up for Goodell's position at all at this time?
Seems and odd thing to do, unless your trying to prevent Vilma from civil/legal action.
I mean what is the purpose of it. He was obviously told her to make these statements.
And her statement come down to this " Oh, believe me and roger, they are guilt"

Her motive to me are much more interesting than anything she said, we have all heard this before.
It's the question I want so badly for a journalist (where is the NY Times - they LOVE this kinda stuff) to ask. You keep SAYING you have all this iron clad, damning evidence, and yet you refuse to show it. WHY?

I like that her participation is referred to on ESPN as an 'independent' observation. The NFL paid this woman. Uh...hello?
iceshack149 and pherein like this.
saintfan is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:00 AM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com
no new posts