05-18-2012, 02:34 PM
|
#24
|
Site Donor MONTHLY
Join Date: May 2002
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 20,907
|
Originally Posted by phocis850
Here's a question, why would Goodell and the NFL show evidence before any potential lawsuits? Why would they give those suspended a leg up in a legal battle? Wouldn't it make sense to have a court take down the players statements and THEN provide the proof?
Why didn't Goodell just hand down punishment without making a media circus and mentioning Vilma several times specifically?
Apparently Hargrove, Fujita and others were just as culpable, why not mention their name over and over again to hurt the remained of their careers?
Doesn't the punishment itself fit the crime? Or does Vilma worthy of extra opprobrium to the extent that it destroys what's left of his career.
|
|
|
|